Today, I’ll
look at one more possible impediment to increase bicycling. The difficulty in grasping the full range of
transportation options that are offered by bicycles.
Bicycling
covers a remarkably wide range of human locomotion, seemingly more than any
other method of transportation. The
six-year-old pedaling along the sidewalk with training wheels and the
professional bicyclist climbing a mountain in the Tour de France are using
machines that are, at their essence, identical.
Surely the
bicycle in the Tour de France is the greater technological achievement, but
both bicycles have human legs rotating pedals which move a chain which drives a
rear wheel. It’s a simple technology
with a remarkably broad range of application.
And that
broad range of application can trip us up.
In our planning documents, we differentiate between the needs of motor
vehicles, addressing local travel, freeways, parking, and emergency
vehicles. But bicycles tend to be
considered as a single element even though different bicyclists can have very
different needs.
To
illustrate my point, I’ll share an anecdote.
Many years
ago, I was a consulting engineer for an Oregon project. The site included some 600 homes, a golf
course, extensive paths, and much else. As
the project developed, there was a regular need to return to the county
planning department for amendments to the project approvals. I organized and wrote most of applications.
About three years
into the development, with another amendment application in preparation, the
local bicycle community came forth with a request that their right to traverse
the property be acknowledged. The
project lay astride the best routes between the city and some fine bicycling trails,
so the request was reasonable.
The
developers agreed to the request. But
when I went to write that that part of the application, we disagreed about
where the bicyclists should ride. Much
of the project had 28-foot roads paralleled by 8-foot pedestrian paths. The developers thought that bicyclists should
be restricted to the paths and that only motor vehicles should be allowed on
the roads. (It was and remains a very typical
perspective.)
I was
appalled by the thought. My first
attempts to argue against it were unsuccessful.
But then I had an idea. I sat
down with members of the project management team, drew boxes representing the
28-foot roads and 8-foot paths, listed the likely users of both including cars,
emergency vehicles, golf carts, recreational
bicyclists, children on bicycles, joggers, casual walkers, and children
at play, and asked the managers to divide the users between the roads and
paths.
Faced with
the vision of golf carts and children at play sharing an 8-foot strip of
asphalt, the managers saw the error of their thinking and agreed that golf
carts and serious bicyclists should use the road instead. And that is how the land use application was
written. The range of bicycling had been
acknowledged.
You might
think that the lesson, once learned, would be long remembered. You’d be wrong. I recently received an email from the
community association for the project. “On
a safety note, when operating golf carts on … walking/bicycle paths, you must yield to
pedestrians and bicyclists.”
Twenty years later, we’re back where we started.
Ironically, I
recently sold my lot in the project. I
moved to California years ago, but continued to own land in the
development. I watched the land market
go way up. I watched the land market
collapse. I was prepared to wait for a
rebound, but received an offer I couldn’t refuse. It was the right decision, but it still feels
hollow to let loose of my last connection to a major part of my life for more
than twenty years. My last action on
behalf of the project will be to forward a link to this blog post, hoping to restore
the road and path, including bicyclists, into where they best fit.
While we
still work to grasp the current range of bicycling, technology offers the
promise of further challenges. Take a
look at this “chainless e-bike”.
Is it a plug-in bicycle? Or is it
the more minimalist motorcycle ever? I
don’t know. But I do know that if we
don’t come to grips with it and its forthcoming kin we’ll be failing to make
use of all the future has to offer us.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment