But it’s not
quite that easy. When I was a young
engineer, I worked in an office building a short distance south of Market
Street in San Francisco. I traveled into
the Montgomery Street BART station and then walked several blocks south. Part of the walk, along the frontage of the Palace
Hotel, was interesting and drew me onwards.
But much of the walk was alongside the uninteresting and largely blank facades
of aging office buildings.
This
recollection of the walk isn’t meant as a complaint. It wasn’t a bad place to walk and it was conveniently
short. But it lacked much to draw a pedestrian
onward. In my case, professional advancement
and a paycheck were adequate incentives.
But it wasn’t a walk that I would have taken on a sunny Sunday
afternoon. And that is a warning sign
for urbanism.
After five
years, I moved to Seattle, a place where I had a longer walk from a bus
stop. But the architecture was more
interesting and the occasional views of Puget Sound were always thrilling. Even in the omnipresent drizzle, I remember
my daily walks in Seattle with more fondness.
And often found myself walking the same streets for recreation.
Making an
urban setting function as a compelling place to walk isn’t a trivial task. But if it isn’t accomplished, if a quarter-mile
walk is perceived as boring or even dangerous, then residents are more likely
to hop into a car. And once in their
cars, they might drive five miles to a different grocery store. That decision would sap the vitality of the
nearby store, making it more likely to close its doors, depriving the residents
without cars of a needed service.
But despite
the importance of a good walking environment, it’s often overlooked in the
planning process. John King, the
architectural critic for the San Francisco Chronicle, recently wrote about walkability issues related to new building design,
including a setting in New York City where walkability was disregarded and
another in San Francisco where the development team is puzzled by the local concerns
about walkability.
Even if
walkability isn’t overlooked in the planning process, finding a good solution isn’t
trivial. Effective walkability relies on
a complicated calculus of good sidewalks, pedestrian safety and comfort, interesting
surroundings, and compelling vistas. It
also requires an accurate assessment of the human emotions related to walking
decisions, which might be the toughest task of all.
With the
recent release of Jeff Speck’s “Walkable City”, walkability is now a hot topic
among urbanist thinkers. Expect more on
this subject in coming months. And feel
free to share thoughts on the walkability issues in your town.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment