Back to the birthday. I don’t feel anguish at being 60 years of age. Instead, I’m astonished at how the time has
flown. What happened to that gawky high
school student and when was he replaced by the grey-headed gent in the mirror?
But it’s
okay. Time passes and memories are
accumulated, most of them good memories.
And the support you’ve shown me over my first 200 blog posts is
certainly among the good ones.
Nor do I
have plans to end this blog anytime soon.
My father lived to be 88. My
mother will turn 82 next month and is going strong. With any luck, a thousand blog posts or more
aren’t out of the question. (Although I
remain willing to share the writing task if anyone is interested. You know where to find me.)
Meanwhile,
the motivation to write remains strong.
Blaise Pascal was a brilliant mathematician of the 17th century. Near the height of his creative genius, he
left the world of mathematics to throw himself into religion. His argument, which is still known as
Pascal’s Wager, was that if there was a god, spending full-time in worship was
appropriate. And if there wasn’t a god,
then mathematics didn’t matter. So the
only rational course was to believe in god and to abandon mathematics.
Perhaps it’s
presumptuous to argue with one of the most brilliant minds of all time, but maybe
it’s my day to be presumptuous. I believe
Pascal had a third option. To believe
that there might be a god who prefers that we spend our energies in making life
better for his creatures, not in following religious dogma.
I once
worked with a very competent engineer.
He believed firmly that engineers should base decisions on data. He argued that “The only rational position
for an engineer is agnosticism.” That
sounds right to me. I can’t prove the
existence of any particular god, but neither can I disprove one. So atheism would be as much of a leap of
faith as religion.
(This isn’t
meant to criticize those of faith. There
are days when I envy your beliefs, even if I find them puzzling. And as John Lennon wrote, “Whatever gets you
through the night, it’s alright, it’s alright.”)
If there is
a god (and I hope there is) and if there is an afterlife (and I hope there is),
then my belief is that the admission ticket to the best seats in the afterlife should
be awarded based not on conformance to dogma, but on service to fellow human
beings and to the world they share.
Once I
decided that secular service was a third path in response to Pascal’s Wager,
there were a number of options that I could have pursued. I find that arguing for more urbanist land-use
patterns is a reasonable one. I believe
that urbanism will give humankind more opportunities to thrive, and better odds
to survive, in an uncertain future. Besides,
the cause resonates with me. So here I
am and here I will continue.
Now, I’m off
to celebrate. Or to begin writing my
next blog post. (They might be the same
things.)
P.S. My
sister, doing what sisters are good at, began my day by emailing me a quote
from Washington Irving, "After a man passes sixty, his mischief is
mainly in his head.”
With all due respect for his skills as a writer, I
think Irving failed to adequately foretell the 21st century. (If I can challenge the wisdom of Blaise
Pascal, questioning Washington is nothing.)
In the 21st century, the post-60 man remains capable of mischief both on-line
and in public forums.
Scheduling Notes
and Follow-Ups
The Petaluma
Urban Chat conversation last week was great.
The only shortcoming was that the reading assignment extended only
through Section I of Jeff Speck’s “Walkable City”. The real meat of the book is in Section II,
so we left ourselves without much of a bone to chew.
However,
everyone, especially those who had begun Section II, found the book particularly
readable and informative, so we decided to read all of Section II by the next
Urban Chat, which will be Thursday, April 9.
If you
haven’t done so already, I highly suggest securing “Walkable City”. And then I suggest joining us in April.
Also, the
Petaluma Planning will begin consideration of the Petaluma Station Area Plan at
their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 26.
The public is invited to the meeting, which will begin in the City
Council chambers at 7:00pm.
Finally,
last week’s post on “Jake’s Walks” didn’t receive the response
for which I had hoped. Not one person
offered a route for an urban walk in their own communities. However, several folks, including some not
from Petaluma, were intrigued by the Petaluma walk I described and asked if we
could schedule a group walk along my route.
No date has yet been picked, but perhaps we can do something on the day of
Jane’s Walk, which is Saturday, May 4.
What do others think?
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
Please keep me on your list for a Jake's Walk in Petaluma — or elsewhere. I DID suggest a particular landmark to include in Petaluma. Now, given your goad above, I have begun a list for Urbanist Dead-Ends for the Petaluma Urban-Walker (UDPU): the pathway that used to go beyond the water reservoir in Oak Hill Park; the bowling alley (at least 2 pathway dead ends created); and the erstwhile-designated connector path over the hill between Sunnyslope Avenue and Sunnyslope Road. Each of these is a loss for human walkers and no doubt some of our mammal and amphibian friends as well.
ReplyDeleteBarry, barring anything unexpected, May 4 looks good for Jake's walk.
DeleteAnd I like your idea of compiling a list of good walks interrupted. Let's chat about it further. Perhaps it can became a blog post.
Please keep me on your list for a Jake's Walk in Petaluma — or elsewhere. I DID suggest a particular landmark to include in Petaluma. Now, given your goad above, I have begun a list for Urbanist Dead-Ends for the Petaluma Urban-Walker (UDPU): the pathway that used to go beyond the water reservoir in Oak Park; the bowling alley (at least 2 pathway dead ends created); and the previously-designated connector path over the hill between Sunnyslope Avenue and Sunnyslope Road. Each of these is a loss for human walkers and no doubt some of our mammal and amphibian friends as well.
ReplyDelete