But much of
the increased revenue will go not toward municipal services, but toward funding
pension obligations and employee benefits.
An article in Petaluma Patch article
explains the situation well.
(This isn’t
going to be a diatribe on the pension and benefit situation. Yes, guaranteed benefit plans were based on
the belief that severe economic downturns were impossible, which was
nonsense. But it was a nonsense in which
almost all elements of the political spectrum participated. The packages were given to police, fire, and
city hall staff with broad support of politicians and voters. For myself, I was concerned, but didn’t see
the full extent of the possible problem.
Nor did I speak out about my concern, so have forfeited my right to cast
stones now.)
So, we have
persistent and increasing urgent needs for municipal services, paired with
budgets that are constrained and unlikely to improve for many years. There aren’t many rays of hope in that
scenario.
But there is
one positive sign. Smart Growth America
chose this week to release their report “Building Better Budgets”. The
report is the first attempt to compile studies from across the nation comparing
the financial results of urbanist versus conventional development.
(Note: New
readers should know that I generally eschew use of the term “smart growth”, preferring
“urbanism”. I believe that urbanism is
smart, but also believe that it’s hard to maintain a civil dialogue when
defining the other person’s beliefs as “dumb”.
I won’t criticize Smart Growth America for their choice of name, but wouldn’t
object if they changed it.)
As the report describes it, the benefits of urbanism to
municipal bottom lines have been increasingly understood for years, but this report
represents the first attempt to pull together all available studies into a
single report. A total of seventeen
studies were considered, including a study of three relatively new projects in
Nashville, Tennessee that was done specifically for the report. The three Nashville projects covered the
range of development options from urban infill to urbanist greenfield to conventional
drivable suburban.
As the
authors acknowledge, many of the studies were performed using different methodologies
and terminologies. They also acknowledge
that not every study found budgetary benefits from urbanism.
But when the
studies are adjusted to a similar basis and averaged, the results are
clear. Urbanism reduces the strain on
city budgets. Some sample numbers:
Infrastructure costs 38 percent less per unit for urbanism projects, property
tax revenue per acre is ten times greater, and the cost of emergency services
is ten percent less.
Regular
readers of this blog will note the similarity between this finding and the StrongTowns
argument. (For newer readers,
StrongTowns contends that conventional suburban development doesn’t generate sufficient
property tax revenue to maintain its infrastructure. And that the absence of financial sustainability
is an underlying cause of our current economic distress. StrongTowns concludes that urbanism is an
appropriate response to the problem.)
The authors
of the Smart Growth America report were seemingly aware of the StrongTowns
argument and were careful not to overpromise based on the study results. They noted that it still wasn’t established
that urbanist development would be financially sustainable, only that it was
more likely to be. It was a laudably
cautious point that didn’t detract from the report.
If your
schedule permits, you may also wish to listen to the on-line presentation of the report. Of particular interest is the story of
Alexandria, Virginia which made an early commitment to urbanism and weathered the
bad economic times more easily that other Virginia communities.
Adopting
urbanist policies and promoting urbanist growth won’t solve the current budget
issues at North Bay city halls. There
are too many existing conventional subdivisions to be maintained. But turning increasingly toward urbanism for
new development will lessen the municipal budget problems of the next
generation. And that’s a worthwhile
accomplishment by itself.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment