To my delight, I found a park that would be an asset to any city. Spokane hosted the 1974 World Expo on a site between
the historical downtown and the Spokane River.
Many of the improvements from that endeavor remain in place as
Riverfront Park. But it wasn’t only the
remnants of Expo ’74 that made Riverfront Park special, it was the setting
along the river and the drama that the river brings to the park.
Nor was the park the only outstanding public amenity. Spokane also offers walking paths along both banks
of the river. The paths connect much of
the community to Gonzaga University and the downtown. Collectively, the paths are known as the Riverwalk.
Luckily, my wife had booked a hotel along the Riverwalk. We were in town less than two days, but I found
time to take three outings along the Riverwalk, all of them enjoyable and
insightful.
For our first outing, we took the Riverwalk to Riverfront Park and
then veered toward downtown. While my
wife did pre-graduation chores, I watched the community play on quirky park
sculptures and cavort in the fountain at the park entrance, celebrating a warm
and glorious Saturday after a snowy winter.
I rejoined my wife for a quick tour of downtown and its fine early
20th century architecture.
But it’s a clocktower that provides a more elegant, traditional
statement of place, providing a connection back to European plazas. As I continued my evening stroll, I found the
clocktower a frequent presence, presenting different aspects as I viewed it
from different angles.
There is a change in texture and color about halfway up the tower,
similar to the Washington Monument. I expect
there’s an interesting story to explain the color break, but our time in
Spokane was too short to ask many questions.
From the clocktower, I wandered toward the feature that truly made
the park special. However, I’ll defer
that story until my next post.
But before closing today, I should write something about
Riverfront Park versus the size of Spokane.
Some people have argued that Petaluma and other North Bay cities need their
own versions of New York City’s Central Park.
I’ve generally disagreed, suggesting that the cities are too small to
support parks of that scope.
Riverfront Park somewhat undermines my argument. It’s an impressive place for a city the size
of Spokane. But I still don’t believe
there’s good application to Petaluma or other North Bay cities.
At over 200,000 people, Spokane at is far bigger than Petaluma and
most North Bay cities. The only North
Bay equivalent to Spokane is Santa Rosa and, for at least two reasons, I’m not
convinced that even Santa Rosa can support a Riverfront Park equivalent.
As one point, Riverfront Park benefits from the planning and
improvements that went into Expo ’74.
Given the costs of mounting a World Expo, I can’t seriously argue that a
North Bay city follow that path, even if a result were to be a great urban
park.
Second, and even more significant to me, I don’t know the extent
to which Riverfront Park claims resources that could be directed to other uses
in Spokane.
During the remainder of our Spokane weekend, we noted many districts
in which public investment would be helpful.
Without digging into the municipal budget, I don’t know the extent to
which the maintenance costs for Riverfront Park preclude those investments, but
I’m dubious that Riverfront Park, no matter how glorious, is the best on-going investment
for Spokane.
So, as much as I enjoyed Riverfront Park, I don’t believe that it’s
a burden I’d wish to impose on a North Bay city.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment