She asked if
I’d spend time with her son. It needn’t
be rigorous mentoring or tutoring, but only a chance for the young man to chat
with an adult male. I agreed.
For our
first outing, I picked an undeveloped park on the outskirts of the town where
we lived. We spent two hours walking along
a creek and through a pine forest while talking about school, life, and
whatever else came to mind.
Early in the
walk, he spied an abandoned Frisbee wedged against a log in the creek. He freed it and let it become the talisman
for the remainder of our walk. When he
wanted a break in the conversation, perhaps a chance to gather his thoughts,
he’d move ahead of me on the trail and we’d toss the Frisbee back-and-forth as
we continued to walk.
The tosses
weren’t long, no more than twenty feet.
It wasn’t a park that accommodated long tosses. But it was a chance for him to collect
himself. When he was ready to resume the
conversation, he’d let me catch up to him and we’d resume our chat.
As we
finished our outing and walked toward my car, the young man suddenly turned
back and put the Frisbee atop a post near the park entrance. Surprised, I asked if he didn’t want to keep
the Frisbee for our next outing. He
responded, “No, I’d rather leave it for someone else to talk the way that we
have.”
It might
have been his most mature life decision in weeks.
It’s
possible that the young man was subject to what author Richard Louv calls a
nature-deficit disorder. And a two-hour
walk in nature was the best thing for what ailed him, far better than any words
I offered.
Louv, author
of “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from
Nature-Deficit Disorder”, argues that, as a nation, we’ve systematically deprived
our children of the exposure to the natural world that they need to grow up
with good emotional health.
He argues that the deficit has resulted from many causes. He cites “the criminalization of natural
play” in which children are discouraged by neighborhood rules from unstructured
outside play. (Louv has also written a
book “America 2” in which he argues that we’ve given to homeowners’
associations a level of control over our lives that we’d never give to a government.)
Louv also notes
the increased time spent in front of electronic screens. And he’s particularly concerned that too many
children aren’t given a chance to learn what nature is, such as the 34 percent
of elementary school students in San Diego who’ve never been to a beach. San Diego!
Louv lacks
the credentials to describe nature-deficit disorder as an official psychiatric condition. But he provides a mound of compelling evidence
for his hypothesis. He notes that
executive function, our ability to manage our many cognitive skills, has rapidly
declined in children in recent decades, the same decades during which children
have become increasingly divorced from nature.
He reports that cognitive skills are shown to improve after time spent
in nature.
Louv
describes how outside exercise shows more benefits that the same exercise
inside. And he reports that attention
deficit disorder is often reduced after time spent in nature.
Louv’s
nature-deficit disorder hypothesis may seem unrelated to urbanism, but he
argues that they should be complementary.
Louv notes that walkable communities offer more opportunities than
sprawling suburbs to connect with nature.
Children on foot, and adults too, are more willing to explore a creek
bed or a copse than the same people in a speeding car. And a denser form of development offers more
opportunities to leave undisturbed pockets of nature.
Louv also suggests
that urbanism, with a renewed connection to nature as a key component, can
become the new environmental movement. He
reports that the average age of environmental organization members is 67, with
new members at 64. He suggests that the
environmental movement is dying because it’s increasingly focused on what human
beings shouldn’t do. He argues that an
environmental movement based on urbanism can have a more positive, affirmative
message.
Because of
this suggested connection to urbanism, Louv was invited to give the opening
plenary at CNU 21, the recent annual meeting of the Congress for the New
Urbanism. If his nature-deficit
hypothesis interests you, I suggest giving a listen to his talk. I
was at the plenary session and found the speech effective and compelling.
Although the
link is through YouTube, the talk is audio only. Personally, I re-listened to it through
headphones connected to my phone, while talking notes on my laptop and watching
a baseball game on a nearby muted television.
The irony didn’t escape me.
Remember the
young man with whom I took the long walk?
He and I spent a couple of years in occasional outings, including nature
walks and mountain lake canoeing.
Eventually life intervened and I moved away. But at his request, I flew in for his high
school graduation. These days, we only
email occasionally, but my wife keeps an eye on him through social media and advises
me whenever he makes a good life decision in which she sees evidence of my
long-ago mentoring. I hope she’s right.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment