I once
served on the board for a charity that provided free home repairs for
homeowners who were financially incapable of doing the repairs themselves. We coordinated the use of donated dollars and
volunteer labor to complete the projects.
I enjoyed my time with the charity and retain fond memories of many projects
we undertook.
I also
learned lessons about aging in place. To
illustrate, I’ll tell the stories of two recipients, whom I’ll call Agatha and
Zelda. Partly to protect privacy and
partly because I don’t trust my memory after a handful of years, many of the
details have been adjusted. But the hearts
of the stories are accurate.
Agatha lived
within walkable distance of downtown, although it had probably been years since
she had made the walk. Her health was
poor. She spent much of her time
watching television alone. Most of her
groceries came from a neighbor who did the shopping. Her frontyard, once well-tended, had fallen
into deep disrepair. Inside, the house
had gone years without routine maintenance.
We tackled the
project with vigor. A crew of new and enthusiastic
volunteers completely updated the frontyard.
We built a ramp to the front door, replaced the hot water heater, and
repaired water damage in the bathroom.
Agatha seemed pleased, but as soon as the volunteers were gone, she
returned to her former life of watching television and relying on her neighbor
for groceries.
Zelda lived a
little further from downtown, in a tidy and architecturally interesting home
that added well to her neighborhood. Although
in her 80s, Zelda tended her yard every week.
She remained socially involved with her neighbors and still drove,
although cautiously.
One of Zelda’s favored possessions was a photograph of her on the back of a motorcycle driven by her son, helmet in place, and smiling broadly for the camera.
The only
repairs that she needed a few items, such as gutter repair, that were beyond
her physical and financial means. A
small crew was able to quickly complete the tasks.
The goal of
our projects was to help Agatha and Zelda “age in place”.
But I think
the problem should be evident to most readers.
Agatha may have been aging in place, but she wasn’t aging well. And I’m not sure that facilitating her
continuation of that life was truly helping her. A better solution may have been for her to
sell the house and to use the proceeds to live her final years in a setting that
could better meet her social, nutrition, and safety needs. Plus, her neighborhood would have gained if a
young family had moved into the home.
I’m not
suggesting that the charity should have pushing that solution on Agatha. That would have beyond our role. But perhaps neither should we will have been
facilitating her current choice.
I can only
speculate about why Agatha wasn’t reaching a relocation decision on her
own. Perhaps she couldn’t see a financial
path to a new living situation. Perhaps she
lacked the skill or energy to tackle a move.
Or perhaps, although her connection to her neighborhood was increasingly
tenuous, she was unwilling to leave the place where she had lived much of her
life. To leave behind the helpful neighbor
and other friends who might still visit her.
And that is
where urbanism comes into play. Although
not always at the forefront of the discussion, one goal of urbanism is to
create residential options for different stages of life, all within walkable
distance of shopping and transit. The
range could be from small apartments for young singles to family homes a bit
further from the core to senior apartments with the option of nursing care.
The concept
of allowing seniors to live out their years in the same neighborhood in which
they lived their lives is gaining momentum.
A senior living facility was proposed in downtown Petaluma several years
ago, although it fell victim to the economic times. The photo above is a senior living home in the
Northwest Crossing neighborhood of Bend, Oregon. It’s located in the heart of a commercial district
with family housing only a short walk away.
In the end,
I’m fine with the idea of aging in place, as long as it’s understood that
sometimes “place” means home and other times it means neighborhood.
If you’re
wondering about Agatha and Zelda, Agatha only lived in her home for another six
months. By then, she was in her final days. She was moved to a convalescent home and
passed away weeks later.
Meanwhile, Zelda
stayed in her home for several more years before deciding on her own that she’d
get more enjoyment out of life in a senior living home. She was right. She quickly made new friends and was a focus
of activity in her new place of living until she passed away.
I’ll never
regret the resources that we spend helping Zelda, but still question whether we
served the community or the recipient with the work we did for Agatha.
Schedule Notes
Petaluma
architect George Beeler will speak at the next meeting of Petaluma Urban
Chat. He’ll talk about a subject that
directly relates to aging in place.
Beeler has been active in the possible local formation of a “Village
Network”.
Village
Networks, which exist in communities throughout the country, are associations that
provide services for senior citizens by acting as a clearinghouse to
coordinate volunteerism among seniors and by vetting local businesses that provide
services for seniors.
I recently
attended a discussion about the Village Networks idea. The concept of aging in place was mentioned
several times, leaving me wary. But then
reference was made to help a member move into accommodations within her
neighborhood that were more suitable for her stage of life. They were words I wanted to hear.
The meeting
will be tomorrow, Tuesday, October 8. As
always, we’ll convene at 5:30pm. The
meeting place will be the Aqus Café, at the corner of 2nd and H Streets in
Petaluma. All are welcome.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
Dave: excellent topic to address in the short term with George Beeler's planned presentation at this month's Urban Chat. In the medium term, I appreciate its relevance for my cohort of folks reaching eligibility for Medicare — with a hooray, I might add. When Janie and I searched out and selected our highly walkable Westside home in our late 30's, we had an eye not just to the decades of enjoying neighborhood life with easy downtown access but also to ease our long-term intentions of "aging in place" a placed we love. I'd very much like to help facilitate the same for all. This blog enriches my thinking about the social and planning processes that requires.
ReplyDeleteBarry, as always, thanks for reading and commenting.
Delete