It’s also imperative
to add walkability to existing neighborhoods where little walkability now
exists. And when I write of walkability,
I don’t mean the exercise kind of walkability, but walkability that meets Jeff
Speck’s four standards of walkability: safety, comfort, interest, and
usefulness. We have vast post-World War
II neighborhoods for which Jeff Speck walkability was designed out by code.
(In
“Walkable City”, Speck proposes that we use a walkability triage in which we
devote no resources to post-World War II neighborhoods, arguing that that
they’re lost causes. I understand his
point, but am unwilling to give up so quickly.
There are a lot of people living in those walkability wastelands and I believe
they deserve attention.)
Retrofitting
Jeff Speck walkability into non-walkable neighborhoods requires multiple tasks,
for many of which city hall has primary responsibility.
Modifying
the zoning ordinance to allow existing homes to be converted to retail uses? That’s a city hall task.
Changing the
zoning map to allow stores on vacant parcels?
That’s a city hall task.
Expanding
transit systems so the more stops can be reached on foot? That’s a
city hall task, along with higher levels of government.
Fixing the
sidewalks and street crossings so that pedestrians are safer? That’s mostly a city hall task.
But not everything
is within the purview of city hall. Getting
folks walking until casual meetings become so commonplace that a critical mass
is created and retailers are motivated to move into a neighborhood? City hall can’t touch that one. It’s a task for the people we see in the
mirror every morning.
But relying
on individual decisions to reach a critical mass, especially when cars are so
darned convenient, is somewhere between unlikely and impossible. We need a mechanism to build a group walkability
consensus.
Luckily for
us, there are groups that do exactly that.
City Repair of
Portland is one. City Repair was a pioneer in helping neighbors
to bond together to build features that reclaim walkability for their
neighborhoods.
My copy of
“Pocket Neighborhoods” is currently on loan, so I don’t recall the exact story,
but author Ross Chapin writes of an early City Repair project, perhaps the very
first one. As I recall, a Portland
neighborhood felt that an intersection needed traffic calming, thereby improving
walkability. They believed a painted
design in the intersection would slow traffic.
They sought approval to do the work themselves. City hall said no.
So they did
it anyway. On a Saturday morning, 200
neighbors blocked the surrounding streets and began to apply paint to the
intersection. The police were
called. The first officer on the scene saw
200 happy adults and children busily painting.
He shook his head and drove away.
He knew that there was no upside to trying to stop the effort. Within months, the City of Portland had approved
the project and had also adopted rules that would allow other neighborhoods to
do similar projects.
From that
beginning, City Repair has continued and has tried to export the concept to
other neighborhoods and cities. Growth
has been slow. It’s hard work to build critical
masses, especially when the message is that neighbors have the right to exert
more control over their neighborhoods, shoving city hall aside. It’s not how most of us were raised.
City Repair has
written a book about what they’ve done and what they hope to continue
doing. “City Repair’s Placemaking
Guidebook: Creative Community Building in the Public Right-of-Way” can seem
repetitive at times, but hammers home the key lessons, which are (1) build a
strong consensus within a neighborhood, (2) don’t settle on a project until
everyone is on board and has had the opportunity to participate in the process,
and (3) don’t be afraid to push if city hall doesn’t accept the concept at
first.
There have
been a few stabs at City Repair projects in Sonoma County. One correspondent recalls chalking an
intersection in Santa Rosa a few years back.
But, like in many areas, a critical mass has been hard to gather.
But that doesn’t
mean that people have stopped trying.
There’s a group in Petaluma trying to bring build a consensus around
City Repair. It’s an exciting possibility
about which I’ll offer more information in my next few posts.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
(Note: Photo
is from StreetsWiki.)
No comments:
Post a Comment