Urbanism
doesn’t particularly lend itself to practical jokes, but it has the potential
for quirkiness and whimsy.
That’s close enough for me to offer this quarterly urbanist celebration of April Fool’s Day.
That’s close enough for me to offer this quarterly urbanist celebration of April Fool’s Day.
For this quarterly
quirk update, I did something a little different. Rather than sweeping over a range of subjects
with quirky angles, I focused on a single subject.
I looked at graffiti,
also known as street art, particularly the phenomenon of Banksy and the aesthetic
alternative that he’s creating.
And once I
was thinking about Banksy, I found myself in a philosophical conundrum. What a way to begin a New Year.
We presumably
all agree that graffiti is generally a bad thing. It sets the stage for further unlawful
activity and diminishes neighborhoods.
But occasionally someone comes along who takes graffiti to another level,
imbuing street art with skill, insight, and whimsy. It becomes difficult to call these people common
criminals.
Banksy is
one of those.
Banksy has
recently been in the news. During the
fall, he made a month-long visit to New York City, putting his characteristic street
art at many locations, most of them in contravention of existing laws. Despite his scofflaw attitude, or perhaps
because of it, New Yorkers flocked to view his installations. Atlantic Monthly and CNN both covered his time in the Big Apple. (If you’re not familiar with his work, I
recommend looking at the photos in one or both links to gain a sense of his style
and content.)
For many,
he’s a star.
Despite that
status, it’s not even clear that he exists.
His Wikipedia article acknowledges
the possibility that there is no Banksy, just a cooperative of street artists who
jointly act as “Banksy”.
Trying to decipher
the mystery, the Daily Mail investigated in depth and concluded that
Banksy is Robin Gunningham from Bristol, a former schoolboy from the Cathedral
School who has left behind a trail of red herrings and blind alleys that make a
master criminal proud. But even with its
effort, the Royal Mail couldn’t completely prove its case.
A website described as his official site provides no insights.
Whether a
real person or a clever cooperative, Banksy is changing the debate about street
art and encouraging those who would tread a similar path. In Minneapolis, an underemployed graphic
artist is pasting his face over
the photos of realtors on public advertisements. And he’s doing it with great skill. The realtors, perhaps relieved not to be
decorated with mustaches and missing teeth, don’t seem offended and instead revel
in the attention.
Meanwhile,
Banksy’s art is going for increasing prices at public auction, including this recent sale in Los Angeles. Collectors including Angelina Jolie and
Christine Aguilera have begun acquiring his work.
So what do I
think about Banksy and those who follow his lead? I don’t know and it makes my head hurt trying
to figure it out. On one hand, I like
the bright line rule that all unauthorized street art is bad and should be
removed. That would be the engineer side
of my personality.
But then I
look at some of Banksy’s work, smile at his whimsy, and acknowledge the
validity of much of his social comment.
I instinctively can’t support any rule that stifles his creativity.
But how do
we give official approval to Banksy, but not to the average untalented tagger? How do we distinguish between the two? I get queasy thinking about a Planning
Commission debating whether a particular street artist offers sufficient whimsy
to be given free rein.
In the end,
the only reasonable standard is to ban all unauthorized street art. But if Banksy or his artistic equal ever
visits the North Bay, I’ll root for him to avoid the authorities and I’ll look for opportunities to take a personal look at his work. It’s that quirky and pertinent.
Meanwhile,
we should remember that Banksy and his social commentary exist only because
there are urban settings that fit his style and that provide adequate audiences
to receive his message. It’s not among
the top reasons why cities are important, but it’s on the list.
On that
note, have a Happy New Year.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment