For several
years, I was on the board of a local Rebuilding Together affiliate, a non-profit
organization that provides free home repairs for low-income homeowners. Like most affiliates, our biggest event of
the year was an April workday when several hundred local citizens volunteered a
day of labor.
One year, a project
captain invited a group of volunteers to her home for post-workday beverages. I found myself in her kitchen, sipping a beer
and chatting with a city councilmember who had worked on a project.
I assume the
councilmember had worked on a mobile home because the discussion quickly turned
to the role of mobile homes in our city.
His view was that mobile homes were a temporary aberration and that the
long-term goal of the city should be to replace them with stick-built
homes. His principal argument was the
longer life of well-maintained stick-built construction, although he also noted
the horizontal spread of single-story mobile homes and the opportunity for more
compact living with stick-built residences.
With that
memory in mind, it was interesting to read the suggestion by Lisa Margonelli in
Pacific Standard that
mobile home parks might have an essential role in the housing future of all of
us, particularly seniors. She looks in
depth at the Pismo Dunes mobile home park, near Pismo Beach, California.
Margonelli’s
argument is that mobile home parks provide a low-cost alternative to other
options, while also fostering a relationship between seniors, a supportive
network that others have called a “naturally-occurring retirement community”.
I’ll use the
dichotomy between the councilmember’s comments and Margonelli’s article as a
starting point from which to write about the possible role of mobile home parks
as senior communities and to conclude a series of posts I’ve written about
urbanism and senior living. I won’t
forget urbanism and seniors and will find opportunities to add more insights on
the subject, but will begin focusing elsewhere in my next post.
Margonelli
makes a reasonable case for mobile homes, but I’ll add another point. Mobile home parks encourage alternative
transportation modes. With narrow roads,
frequent driveways, and a well-gridded layout, automobile drivers intuitively
reduce their speed, often as low as 15 miles per hour, well below the 20 mile per hour threshold
where the dominance of cars begins to wane.
Margonelli
notes the use of golf carts in the Pismo Dunes, which can be a fine choice for
seniors no longer capable of handling an auto.
I can add
another transportation option. A North
Bay reader emailed me extolling her adult tricycle, noting the improved
mobility which it has given her and including a photo of a Napa senior on a tricycle
touring the damage on the morning after the recent earthquake. An adult tricycle can be another fine
alternative transportation choice within a mobile home park.
Also,
walking within a mobile home park is often safer than walking on city streets.
Against the
positives noted by Margonelli and by me, there is a legitimate list of concerns
about mobile home parks as a housing solution, including some that touch upon
the councilmember’s concerns.
Heading the
list is construction quality. Margonelli
notes that quality of mobile homes has been improving. She’s likely correct, but mobile homes still
remain at the lower-end of the construction spectrum. And it seems inevitable that they’ll remain
at the lower-end.
During my
time on the Rebuilding Together board, we often debated how much money to
allocate toward mobile home repair.
Although we never went as far as another affiliate which limited mobile
home repairs to one-third of their annual budget, we remained aware of the potential
black hole of mobile home repairs. Many
years, we could have spent our entire budget on mobile homes and still left
needs unmet. Plus we found that repairs
to stick-built construction were less likely to require return visits in future
years.
Next, the density
of most mobile home parks is insufficient to support urban uses such as stores
or pubs. (Margonelli notes that a
grocery store is within walking distance of Pismo Dunes, but the store is
beyond the boundary of the mobile home park and even then remains an
anomaly.) It’s the inherent nature of
the single-story, non-shared-wall development to spread out, reducing the
number of residents within walkable distance of businesses.
Furthermore,
the nature of most mobile home parks is to be enclosed, with limited entry
points and few opportunities for others to pass through a park enroute to other
destinations. But the nature of an
effective urban community to be well-gridded, allowing efficient travel, which
is essential for those on foot or bicycles.
Perhaps the
only location is which mobile home parks don’t undermine an urban land-use
configuration is where they back against any geographical feature that would
have already precluded urban connections.
It’s not coincidental that Pismo Dunes backs up to an ocean beach or
that many of the Petaluma mobile home parks adjoin a freeway.
But the biggest
concern about mobile home parks, at least to me, is the social insulation. I’ve been reading “The Filter Bubble” by Eli
Pariser. His thesis is that
personalization of internet experiences, by which Google, Yahoo, Facebook, and
others feed us articles consistent with what they’ve calculated to be our interest
and values, undermines the free flow of objective information on which our
democracy depends.
The internet
personalization models against which he rails is evident in our every internet
session. In the last week, I’ve researched
travel options in Ireland and senior living facilities in the North Bay. Now, I can’t go anywhere on the internet
without being bombarded by ads for Irish tour services and North Bay senior
living options. It feels both creepy and
intrusive.
Similarly, I
had a frequent commenter on Petaluma Patch who was continually offering links
to anti-urbanism articles from obscure and credibility-challenged sources. At first, I marveled at his misplaced diligence
in finding these articles.
However, I came
to realize that he had created a filter bubble in which the internet was
feeding him anti-urban articles. He had
only to go on-line to have an article shoved in front of him which, with dubious
fact and flawed logic, seemed to rebut something I had written. And he then felt a need to accept the article
as the truth and to share it.
It was a
shame that the opportunity for the two of us to have a rational exchange of
perspectives was undermined by the internet.
Urbanism
combats the personalization trend on the internet. I love the idea of a CEO and a mail clerk talking
in the elevator of an apartment building where both live, each if one is in a
penthouse when the other is in a micro-apartment. Similarly, I like watching various
demographic segments chatting in a downtown pub.
My personal
hell would be to live among folks who are like me and who think as I do. Even as I age, I want to live among people
who offer new and thought-provoking perspectives. We already offer too few of these opportunities
and mobile home parks, by their very nature, are part of the deficiency.
Summing it
up, while Margonelli makes a reasonable case for mobile home parks, I favor the
position of the councilmember. As a
housing solution, particularly as we move toward a more urban world, we can and
should do better than mobile home parks.
By the way,
nothing here is intended to disparage the residents of mobile home parks nor to
criticize the choice of people who find enjoyment in their mobile homes. Instead, it is to castigate the rest of us
for creating a world in which mobile homes, with all their deficiencies, are
the only option for many folks.
In my next
post, I’ll write about water conservation.
Candidates for the Petaluma City Council have been talking about a
moratorium on building permits while the drought persists. I applaud the concern, but will argue that another
approach would be more appropriate.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment