Regular
followers have read the following recitation so many times that they can likely
anticipate every word. But for the new
readers, I should lay out the background before moving to the heart of this
post. I’ll try to do so expediently.
Petaluma
Urban Chat, a citizens group that sprung from readers of this blog, has been
studying the possible re-use of the Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds. The Fairgrounds site is owned by the City of
Petaluma, which leased it to the Sonoma Marin Fair Board under a contract that
will expire in 2023. And eight years can
be the blink of an eye in the world of land use. The end of the current lease will provide an
opportunity to reduce the size of the Fairgrounds and to redevelop a portion of
the site.
The site is
well-located between downtown Petaluma and the freeway and can likely support
moderately intense urban-style development.
Also, the site is only four blocks from the coming SMART train
station. Working outside the auspices of
the City or the Fair Board, Urban Chat has begun considering a possible
plan. The twin goals are to educate ourselves
about the opportunities and constraints at the site and to have a plan to show
to interested members of the community.
After a
couple of different approaches didn’t gain traction, we hit upon a mini-charette
format and have been working steadily toward a plan that should represent a group
consensus. Although, in place of
mini-charette, I probably should have described the process as a slow-moving and
unfacilitated charette.
(A note on
terminology: One reader took me to task for using the word “charette”, thinking
that many wouldn’t know it. I suspect
that “charette” is more widely understood that he thinks, but I’m always willing
to fill possible knowledge gaps.
“Charette” is derived from the French word for cart. The original use referred to the cart in
which a representative of the king would arrive in the town square and advise
the citizens of the changes that were coming their way. Over time, it came to refer to a process by
which the citizens had a chance to comment upon and to shape the changes.
Today, charette
refers still refers to a process by which the community participates in a land-use
decision. A contemporary charette is
usually time intensive, perhaps extending over a three-day weekend, and is
facilitated by an architect or other land-use professional. As Petaluma Urban Chat meets once a month
and, although several land-use professionals participate, none are paid to
direct the effort, my description of our process as a slow-moving and
unfacilitated charette is reasonable.)
We’ve met
twice under the charette process. In
November, we settled on a package of land uses that we
thought would best serve the community.
In December, we decided which portion of the site would be available
for re-use and which would retain the reduced fair footprint. (The December decision forced changes in the
November allocations.)
This history
sets the stage for the next and near-final task, developing a site plan. Over the next month or so, we’ll assign locations
on the re-use site for the selected land uses.
The November
and December decisions, although different formats were used, were made using
everyone in attendance. However, the
site planning process is more complex and not well-suited to twenty-five people
trying to find consensus in a single meeting.
Instead, we’ll break into teams.
Over the
next month, each team will develop a plan for presentation to the entire Urban
Chat group. We’ll try to assign a
land-use professional to each group, not to direct the teams, but to have
familiarity with raising the key issues and guiding groups toward consensus. Also, the charette steering committee, architect
Ross Jones, local urbanist David Powers, and me, will help facilitate where we
can. (When not facilitating, Jones,
Powers, and I will develop our own site concept.)
The schedule
for the three site planning meetings will be:
Tuesday, January
13: Set teams and begin planning.
Tuesday, January
27: Optional meeting for facilitation.
(The teams are, of course, also welcome to meet at other times if they
wish.)
Tuesday, February
10: Presentation of team plans and selection of best plan. There can also be discussion of combining the
best elements of several plans.
All three meetings
will be held at Taps in the River Plaza shopping center, across the Balshaw
Bridge from downtown Petaluma. The
address is 54 East Washington Street.
All three meetings will begin at 5:30pm.
I’d like to say that all three meetings will conclude by 7:00, but the
likely compelling nature of the discussions may result in the meetings carrying
on somewhat longer.
Following the
last meeting, we’ll put together the best possible graphics of the result to
share with the community. The graphics
will be a challenge given our non-existent budget, but we’ll do the best we can
and aren’t above relying on the kindness of strangers. (Hint, hint.)
To assist
the teams in their site planning, they’ll be given a list of questions to consider
as they ponder the site. The preliminary
list of questions follows, although other questions may be added before Tuesday.
Where
would the fair-attending public enter the reconfigured fairgrounds?
The
current fairgrounds layout includes extensive parking. How might parking work for the new
fairgrounds?
The
Director of the Live Oak Charter School advised Urban Chat in December that, as
long as the education function was enhanced, the school might be amenable to
relocation. Where would the school fit
in the new plan?
Extensive
projects don’t get built in a single phase.
Where would the initial redevelopment occur and in what direction would future
increments proceed?
The
Old D Street neighborhood has reportedly been resistant to change. How would you structure the project to
minimize their concerns or to provide them sufficient amenities to support the
redevelopment?
The
principal entrance to the East Washington Place shopping center adjoins the
north end of the redevelopment area. If
it remains in place, it would be a barrier between the redevelopment and the
swim center/skateboard park. Would you
look at relocating the entrance? And if
you do, how would you mollify the shopping center owner and tenants?
To
what extent do you anticipate the Petaluma citizens who don’t live nearby visiting
the re-use site? How would you handle
their arrival and their parking?
In
the blog post that reported the results of the most recent meeting, a street
grid system was proposed for the re-use site.
The blocks that are shown are similar in size to the blocks in the Old D
Street neighborhood, which are unusually large for a residential neighborhood
or an urban setting. Would you use that grid
system, would you add some intermediate streets to reduce the block size, or
would you propose a different street system?
Also, we
have maps and plans of the existing site conditions which can be available on
paper and electronically at the meeting.
I hope you
find the potential of this process to be intriguing and will consider joining
us on January 13. You’re also encouraged
to bring friends. All are welcome at Urban
Chat meetings. If you haven’t attended
the recent meetings, you’ll have a bit of catch-up to do, but the links above
will help with that effort and the Urban Chat folks are always happy to assist
newcomers.
And if you
wish to do any preparation before the upcoming, you might look at the Petaluma Station Area master plan for the types
of buildings that could fit on the Fairgrounds or perhaps read my post about UrbanPlan, a high school program
challenging students to develop a plan for a site with some similarities to the
Fairgrounds.
Next, I’ll return
to my New Years Intro to Urbanism, with a review of the many reasons why
urbanism is a good solution to land use in the 21st century.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment