I know a
young couple with two young sons who moved to the North Bay a few years
back. Coming from a snowy clime, they were
excited by the walkability opportunities in the more clement North Bay,
particularly the possibility of the older son walking to school. So when they looked for a home, being within
walkable distance of a good school was near the top of their list.
They soon
found a home they liked, a little less than a half-mile from a well-regarded
school. The walk would be through a safe
neighborhood and would pass by a park offering the possibility of post-school
play. The fit seemed fine. They moved in, eager to begin their new
lives.
As the new
school year approached, they tried to register the son at the school. For the first time, they learned that the
school was designated a magnet school and that not all students, even those
within walkable distance, were accepted for enrollment. They were told that children from within the
neighborhood were given preference, but that individual decisions were made about
every student.
Even more
confounding, the administrators who would make the decision about this young
man were on vacation and wouldn’t return until shortly before the start of
school.
With 24
hours to go before the school year started, the first day clothes were laid out
and ready to be donned, the young man was eager to begin his new educational
adventure, and the parents still didn’t know whether they could walk him to
school the following morning or if the next day would be the first day of a
year-long routine of driving him to and from a more distant school.
I’m not an
educational expert. Personally, I did
fine with attending the schools nearest to the homes in which I grew up. But I remember sharing classrooms with
students who, in retrospect, might have fared better under alternative
schooling approaches. So I won’t suggest
that the proliferation of magnet and charter schools is a bad idea.
But I will suggest
that encouraging that proliferation without accounting for the resulting
traffic is an unacceptable oversight.
Admittedly, it’s an oversight that is typical of much American thought
about traffic, but it’s an oversight regardless.
To be fair,
I’ll acknowledge that I often received rides to school when I was a
student. Playing the baritone horn led
to that result. But from first grade
through high school, my total days of walking, biking, or riding the bus far outnumbered
the parental rides. Too few students can
make the same statement today.
I remember the
first time I became aware of the growing trend of parental rides to
schools. I was working with the Facilities
Manager for the school district in a small Oregon town. We were scoping site improvements at an
existing elementary school.
The
Facilities Manager noted the need for a separate bus route to the school, a route
that would leave the public street nearly a block away and wind past the playground. I was puzzled by the idea. He suggested that I visit the site at the end
of the school day. I did. He was right.
Cars were backed up a block away, with buses stuck in their midst, busting
bus schedules for the entire district. I
was shocked. It was a scene I’d never
seen in my youth.
And, because
the school wasn’t sited in a particularly walkable setting, many of the parents
were likely from within the boundaries for the school. The traffic problem is only exacerbated when
the parents begin using arterials and freeways to reach alternative schools.
What is the
cost of these miles? In my last post, I suggested that a vehicle
mileage tax (VMT) of ten cents per mile and a gas cost of $10 per gallon were
first cuts at the charges that would accurately move the costs of driving from governmental
general funds to the drivers. If we
assume a three-mile drive each way twice per day to an alternative school, the annual
cost of driving would about $1,000.
Today, the
cost would be about $300 in gas costs only.
We do a fine job of reimbursing the oil companies for the gasoline they
provide, but we’re leaving about $700 to picked up the general funds of local
government (road wear and tear), state government (addressing climate change),
and federal government (managing the geopolitical implications of a
petroleum-dependent world).
There is an
equity issue that raises its head in the middle of this train of thought. If we begin assigning costs of $1,000 per
year for attendance at alternative schools, aren’t affluent parents more
capable of covering those costs, resulting in the children of affluent families
being more effectively educated and thereby perpetuating income inequality?
It’s a legitimate
concern that I share. Even though I
largely view the world from the perspective of land use, the issues of income
inequality are still evident to me. And
I believe that a solution is required.
But the challenge
to lower income parents to pay the accurate cost of transporting their children
to alternative schools is a downstream effect of inequality. Good solutions should address causes, not
effects. In a world where we charge per
unit for water, milk, and electricity, to not charge for road usage and its
impacts isn’t a cohesive strategy, it’s a scattershot.
Before
closing, I should also make it clear that I’m not criticizing parents who have
put their children into alternative schools.
Parents who have made the extra effort to find the right educational
setting and resources for their child to succeed should be praised. But if we don’t accurately assign the costs
of those decisions then we perpetuate a distorted world in which flawed
decisions follow.
Instead, those
parents should look for ways to deliver their children to school by bike, on
foot, through transit, or in carpools. Living
in urban settings where those options are more available and where the routes
are less likely to include arterials that are more dangerous to walkers and bike
riders is also a good idea.
If you’re wondering
about the young man about whom I began this post, he was accepted, at the last
minute, into his neighborhood school. He’s
thriving there. His parents are now
focused on ensuring that his younger brother has the same walkable experience.
Having
touched upon the vehicle mileage tax in my last two posts, I’ll dig a little
deeper into a high-tech approach to VMTs in my next post. It’s an idea that has remarkable
upsides. And scary downsides.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
As a parent I'm currently struggling with this exact same issue in Sebastopol. My daughter has been walking to a local charter school for 9 years. For high school, she elected to go to an arts magnet program at Santa Rosa High. Why I'm excited about the opportunities for her, I struggle with knowing she could have gone to the public school in Sebastopol and continue to walk. We have a neighbor at the same school so carpooling is possible, and a public bus route is possible, although the times are not ideal. While I agree that generally school choice is a good thing, the impact to traffic is never discussed so thank you for bringing it up. The number of parents of children who do live within walking distance, yet drive their children to school astounds me. So it's not just school choice. It's just a function of our society that we automatically hop in a car to go anywhere, without considering the fact that many trips are walkable or bikeable.
ReplyDeleteIn a related issue, I've been trying to stop my daughter's elementary charter school relocation from a central site downtown, to a property outside the city limits. I've written several blog posts of my own on the subject. It still needs a use permit from the county, which I'm hoping to be able to stop, but it's an uphill battle.
Smalltown, thanks for the response and the confirmation. I understand the conflict you're feeling. We've set up our world with all the wrong incentives and it's hard to know how not to succumb.
DeleteAnd I certainly agree that we're too likely to hop into our cars even when other options are available. While out walking a family dog this evening, I bumped into a couple who was starting a mile walk into downtown for dinner. And it was dusk, so their trip home would be well after sunset. It was both surprising and inspiring.
I know something about Sebastopol charter school relocation. I know one of the other parents who tells me that they looked everywhere for downtown solutions, but couldn't find the right fit. I should check in with him again.
Lastly, I owe you an email about getting together in Sebastopol for a chat. I promise it'll happen in the next couple of months.