Historic train station in Petaluma |
Sometime in
the next few weeks, SMART will begin running their full schedule of
trains. All thirty daily runs, fifteen
southbound and fifteen northbound. No
passengers will be aboard, but otherwise the operation will be identical to the
future passenger service. Proving up the
system with this full-scale multi-week test, including crossing gate
operations, station wait times, lift bridge management, and use of double-track
sections, will be a critical step toward gaining approval for revenue service.
I’ve asked
about an exact start date for the test, but haven’t yet been told one. SMART may still be in discussions with federal
regulators over scheduling and test conditions.
I had hoped
to publish this post a day or two before the testing begins, but will be
leaving for an urbanism conference in a few days. Not wanting to miss the window, I’ll publish
today and hope I write memorably enough for my suggestion to be retained.
The start of
full-scale SMART testing is also that start of an opportunity for North Bay urbanists
to provide an essential service to their communities. But we can only do so if we keep our heads.
I’ll begin with
a hypothetical question.
Imagine
you’re an uncle with a 25-year-old nephew who has made bad life choices. (If you want to make it an aunt and niece,
that would also work. Feel free to adjust
the story elements to fit the chosen gender.)
Let’s say
the young man ended his education short of his high school diploma, has a
spotty job record, largely because of a problem with authority, has had alcohol
abuse issues, and has a child for whom he’s in arrears on support
payments. It’s a not uncommon
story. He may not yet have a criminal
record, but he’s on a path for which problems with the law is a possibility.
Now let’s
say that the young man has been startled into wanting to turn his life
around. Perhaps a current friend has
been arrested. Or maybe a friend from
high school, who made different choices, is doing well in life. Either way, the young man has found motivation
to change his life path. But having
burned bridges with his parents, he comes to you for advice.
You help him
develop a plan. Begin studies toward his
GED and explore options for further education.
Dial down his attitude so he can retain a job. Cut back on the partying. Work with the child’s mother to come up with
a payment plan. Begin building a
relationship with the child.
It’s now
been three months. You and your nephew meet
to review his progress. He’s making
progress on the GED, will take his final tests in the next month, and has begun
talking with a counselor at the junior college about class options. He’s still at the same job, although he
missed a promotion when he picked the wrong moment to spout off.
He’s nearly
stopped partying, although there was one evening at a pub when too much beer
was consumed, words were exchanged, and punches were thrown, none doing damage.
He’s making
child support payments and spending every Sunday afternoon with the child,
although there was one shouting match with the mother that resulted in the
police being called. Tempers cooled
before the squad car arrived.
So, what is
your response as an uncle/mentor? Do you
praise him for the progress he’s made and work with him on changing behaviors
to address the instances of backsliding?
Or do you lambaste him for his mistakes?
Although many
of us would enjoy the adrenalin rush that would be triggered by an angry outburst,
we hopefully also understand that good mentoring requires the calm blending of positive
reinforcement with problem solving assistance.
And it’s a
great thing we know that because it’s a lesson that will soon become important
to the North Bay communities.
When SMART
begins running thirty trains each day, many of our towns are going to be challenged,
especially those with tracks running through key downtown transportation
corridors. That list begins with San
Rafael and Petaluma, but Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, and Novato may also have
issues. Streets that are already near
capacity will be pushed into traffic jams and tempers will be frayed.
And that
will only be the start of the problems. Later
in the year when passenger service begins, the problems will be multiplied as
drivers circle, looking for parking places near the train stations, and as
transit buses, trying to deliver passengers to the stations, become ensnarled
in seas of cars.
Faced with
the chaos, many in the North Bay will make three accusations. They’ll claim that the North Bay cities, through
typical incompetence, failed to plan for the arrival of the trains, that SMART
was always a dumb idea, and that trains don’t work in the modern world.
Urbanists must
be prepared with calm, measured responses, continuing to praise the region for the
foresight that resulted in SMART, noting that the North Bay cities have done
much to accommodate the return of passengers trains to downtowns after an absence
of a half-century, and that transit, including trains, is an essential element
of the contemporary world, pointing to BART and Caltrain as examples.
But it’s
also fair to leaven the praise with the acknowledgement that SMART and the
cities could have done more to prepare for the return of passenger rail,
including better parking plans and more progress toward transit-oriented
development.
In essence,
urbanists will need to act as calm, restrained mentors to their North Bay communities,
praising the progress that has been made with the opening of rail service,
encouraging further progress toward integrating the train with land uses, and
deflecting the arrows from those who are interested only in the adrenalin rush
of uninformed indignation.
It won’t be
an easy job, but it must be done for our communities to continue to mature away
from the car-oriented paradigm. I hope
you can all join me in the task. Your
cities/nephews will appreciate it.
In
recognition of the coming SMART milestones, my next post will be a collection
of links about rail transit.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment