Walkability in the Soho District of London |
I’ve
returned from CNU 24, the annual gathering of the Congress for the New
Urbanism. As always, the conference was
inspirational and motivational. I’ve come
back flush with new connections, eager to broach new ideas, and primed to suggest
new initiatives.
But it’d be a
strategic mistake for me to step too far too quickly. Given its often narrow base within North Bay
politics, urbanism can’t be implemented in broad strokes. Instead, urbanists must edge toward the inevitable
tipping point with persistent incremental steps, finding pivotal moments to
weigh in with urbanist perspectives on issues that have already found their way
onto North Bay agendas.
Thus, my
weekly summary of upcoming meetings and other opportunities with urbanist
angles follows below. Perhaps because
we’re moving into summer, it’s a light week, but hopefully readers will find
something that stirs them to action.
Upcoming Meetings
MTC/ABAG,
Monday, June 13, 6:00pm, Luther Burbank Center for the Arts, 50 Mark West
Springs Road, Santa Rosa – This is the Sonoma County edition of a series of meetings
that have been seeking input into the Bay Area 2040 plan on growth scenarios and
resulting transportation funding strategies.
I attended the Marin County meeting and, having another meeting on the
same evening, will pass on this one. But
I suggest that anyone with an interest in growth and transportation in the North
Bay make time to learn how MTC and ABAG have framed the issues.
Petaluma
Planning Commission, Tuesday, June 14, 7:00pm (see update below), Petaluma
City Hall, 11 English Street, Petaluma – The Adobe Road Winery is seeking to
establish a wine-making footprint in downtown Petaluma. But the permitting and construction steps
toward that goal will be long and slow.
To make the Adobe Road name more familiar in Petaluma as the bigger
project creeps ahead, the winery is seeking approval for
a tasting room in the Great Petaluma Mill, at the
corner of Petaluma Boulevard and B Street.
Petaluma has
long been perceived as on the fringe of the Sonoma County wine scene, although
the pending approval of a Petaluma Gap appellation could change that
perception. The proposed tasting room,
to my knowledge only the second winery-branded tasting room in downtown
Petaluma, would be another step on Petaluma’s path to the wine mainstream.
While a wine
tasting room on its surface may not be urbanist, any land uses that pull people
downtown, creating a sense of activity and place, is urbanist. A wine tasting room meets that standard.
I have a
pair of earlier obligations on my calendar for the evening, but will attend the
hearing if time permits.
(Update –
Due to a notification error, Petaluma Planning has deferred this hearing to
Tuesday, June 28.)
Sonoma
Marin Area Rail Transit Board, Wednesday, June 15, 1:30pm, 5401 Old Redwood
Highway, Petaluma – Despite what was said during the June 1 meeting, a further
discussion on Clipper isn’t on the SMART Board agenda. Indeed, there is nothing of apparent urbanist
interest on the agenda. But
with the launch of revenue service only months away, there may still be value
in attending to listen to public and Board comments.
Petaluma
Tree Advisory Committee, Wednesday, June 15, 3:30pm, Petaluma City Hall, 11
English Street, Petaluma – Although the topic is likely beyond their purview,
an interesting subject is on the Tree Committee agenda as a result of a letter
from a citizen. The missive notes the conflict between the
street tree planting encouraged by the City years ago and the sidewalk damage now
resulting from the roots. The writer
asks for City assistance with sidewalk repair to avoid tree removal by financially-constrained
homeowners.
(As a
sidenote, I know that the current City list of approved street trees specifically
avoids trees known to damage sidewalks. But
I don’t know if the same was true when the trees noted by letter writer were
planted.)
The letter
frames a conundrum of our contemporary world.
As either a city or as homeowners, we don’t have the resources to fix
the sidewalks, largely as a result of the cost burdens resulting from the
drivable suburban paradigm. But
retaining the trees is essential for urbanism because traffic is slowed by the constraining
influence of trees and shade from trees are both essential elements of the walkability
needed for urbanism.
The choice
becomes digging deep, probably through tax increases, to repair the sidewalks
so the trees can be retained or felling the trees and continuing along the path
toward drivable suburbia that will impoverish us by other means.
It’s a
Hobbesian choice that should be considered at the highest levels of city government,
which isn’t the Tree Committee, but it may still be interesting to watch how
the Tree Committee handles it.
Novato Planning
Commission, Wednesday, June 15, 7:30pm, Novato City Hall, 901 Sherman
Avenue, Novato – The Novato Design Review Commission will take up a proposed senior living facility on South
Novato Boulevard. The site is on a
four-lane arterial, flanked by a pair of churches, and is therefore of little interest
to urbanists.
Further, I’m
sure that the proposed developer, Oakmont Senior Living, will do a fine job
with the architecture. I recently toured
an Oakmont facility and found it light, airy, and comfortable.
But I’ve included
the meeting to raise a point. When I’m
in need of senior housing, I don’t want to be put in a building fronting on a
four-lane arterial and flanked by churches.
I want to be in a place where I can walk to a pub, theatre, hardware
store, and bus stop. I want to be
downtown. I regret that we don’t give
the seniors of today that choice and will push whenever possible for more
downtown senior living facilities so they exist when I need them.
Rail~Volution,
October 10-12, Hyatt Regency, San Francisco – The leading conference on the use
of rail for community building is coming to San Francisco this fall. I’m planning on attending.
Other Involvement Opportunities
Petaluma
Boulevard South – When I last issued this calendar, I noted how bikeable/walkable
revisions to Petaluma Boulevard South had flickered onto and off of the
Petaluma City Council agenda. I’m still trying
to discover the background of the passing mention.
However, a
group of citizens was energized by the brief flicker and is organizing to bring
the subject of calming Petaluma Boulevard South back to the City Council,
hopefully with enough votes to support it.
If you’re
interested in advocating for improvements to Petaluma Boulevard South that will
make the street more friendly for non-motorists and will allow better connectivity
between the residential areas southwest of the street and the retail/recreational
opportunities to the northeast, let me know.
I’ll get you in touch with the forming group, of which I’ll be a member.
Lots of
opportunities to get involved. Please
grab at least one and hopefully more.
When I next publish,
I’ll begin telling of my experiences with CNU 24. I’ll start with a few of my mobility experiences
in the city.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment