A County courthouse in Tennessee |
The local
newspaper recently included the final 2015-16 report from the Sonoma County
Civil Grand Jury. I’m not an expert on
grand jury reports, with my interest normally limited to a hope that my name
isn’t somewhere in the report. However,
this report seemed nicely structured and written. Concise, to the point, and not wandering too
far afield in a muckraking scavenger hunt.
The Grand
Jury noted seven local concerns. It’s insightful
to consider those concerns from an urbanist perspective.
Maintenance
funds for County roads are lacking - The inability of government to cover
the costs of infrastructure maintenance and other government functions is at
the top of most “Why urbanism?” lists, up there with climate change.
Affordable
housing is in a continual crisis – Although not often noted, the cost of
transportation can approach the cost of housing for low income families. And yet affordable housing is frequently built
on sites where cars are essential, many times ensuring that the families in
affordable housing will continue to lose financial ground.
One solution
is to put affordable housing in places where walkability, bikeability, and
transit are reasonable options, such as near downtowns.
But the
better solution to make more of the community into places where walkability,
bikeability, and transit are reasonable options, including current affordable
housing developments. This solution is the
central goal of walkable urbanism.
The Law
Library is in financial trouble – The proposed solution requires additional
funds from the County, the same County that is already struggling to find
resources to maintain infrastructure and other services because of the cost of
suburbia.
Retirement
benefits for the County Public Library are underfunded – Yet another
financial concern for a County government that already has too many because of
the costs of suburbia.
The County
should be doing a better job of overseeing Special Districts – See above.
Citizen
complaint procedures are working well – This is the only subject without a
credible connection to the failure of suburbia and the need for urbanism. It’s also the only subject on which the Grand
Jury has no suggestions to make.
Better
accommodation for women prisoners should be made at the County Detention
Facilities – Yet another demand on the County’s finances that are already over-stressed
by suburbia.
In the final
tally, of the seven issues raised by the Civil Grand Jury, two are directly
related to the land-use pattern of suburbia and four require funds from a County
budget stressed by suburbia. The only
issue without a tie to suburbia is the only issue on which the Grand Jury is
completed satisfied. The pattern is hard
to miss.
My next post
will be the weekly update of public advocacy opportunities for urbanists.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment