Building on International Boulevard near the Ghost Ship |
I'm usually not
one to talk back to the television during news broadcasts. I may arch an occasional eyebrow if I find the
understanding deficient on a key point, but that’s usually my limit.
However,
there are exceptions. One recently occurred
during the reporting on the Ghost Ship fire. For those who don't live in California, or
have been in a monastery for the past week, a warehouse that had been illegally
converted into residential space near the Fruitvale BART station in Oakland burned
a week ago at the loss of 36 lives.
During a
news broadcast a couple of days after the fire, an Oakland City Councilmember
took advantage of his 15 minutes of fame to describe the tragedy as a failure
of the code enforcement role of the Oakland Fire Department.
His comments
missed the fundamental point. And I expressed my thinking in strong words,
interrupting my wife's viewing of the broadcast.
The problem
is ultimately much deeper than whether the nine Fire Marshals of the Oakland Fire
Department should have somehow inspected 20,000 commercial properties every year.
Instead the two root level issues are
that we don't provide enough funds to many civic functions such that there can
be any reasonable chance of complying with the multiplicity of laws and that we
don’t have a commitment to provide housing for all.
Our cities are
severely deprived of funds, a situation that has been inescapably and
inexorably getting worse since the 1978 passage of Proposition 13. We know this to be true, the civic balance
sheets show it clearly, and yet we don’t accept responsibility for the
shortfalls.
There have
been letters in the Bay Area papers arguing that excuses of inadequate
resources or staffing aren’t appropriate responses to a loss of human life in
the Ghost Ship. Poppycock. We can’t ask public employees to perform
their duties at impossible speeds so our tax bills can be a little lower, especially
when none of us work at superhuman rates at our jobs. Municipal services have reasonable costs and
we must be prepared to pay them.
And with
regard to the availability of housing, as long as we allow housing to be the product
of a free market and a patchwork of subsidies, public and private, there will
be people who fall through the cracks and needs the low rents of places like
the Ghost Ship to avoid living on the street.
This is particularly true in a region that has a chronic housing shortage.
So, what are
the connections between these two issues and the walkable urbanism which is the
primary topic of this blog? Walkable
urbanism is a less expensive way of building cities, freeing up funds for other
civic obligations such as fire inspections.
And walkable
urban settings are the least expensive places to add new housing. Walkable urban place won’t solve housing
shortages just by existing, but they make it easier to solve the shortages if
we choose to do so.
Walkable urbanism
is the answer to many questions. And the
Ghost Ship fire illustrates exactly that if only we will listen and not blabber
about simplistic and unhelpful answers such as the failures of overwhelmed fire
marshals.
My next post
will return to the proposed road diet in my town.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete