The
Brin/Google team has made remarkable progress with the technology and with public
approval. Driverless cars are now legal
in three states, most recently California.
To commemorate the last, Governor Jerry Brown made a morning commute in a driverless car to observe the
new technology. And many of the Google
Streetview pictures in Nevada are now being collected by driverless vehicles.
For now, all
state laws require a human continue to occupy the driver’s seat. The passenger/driver must be ready to assume
control if the computer system finds a situation it’s not prepared to handle,
such as street construction.
Beyond that,
I wonder how a computer system can handle eye contact with a pedestrian at the
next street corner, trying to determine if the pedestrian intends to cross the
street or is only looking for an overdue girlfriend. Or to spot the cat trotting across a lawn and
intuit that the cat may next dash under a parked car and into in the street
directly in front of the driverless car.
But given
the progress that all technology has made, it’s likely wrong to assume that these
concerns with driverless technology problems can’t be solved.
Which leads
to the question of the implications for urbanism. I can conceive two very different paths.
If the
problem of the driver needing to be continually in place behind the wheel can’t
be solved, then I see that the relationship between car and driver will become
closer than ever. If a driver must
assume control at a moment’s notice, it will be essential that the driver be
fully comfortable with the vehicle. We
will become more wedded than ever to our personal vehicles.
And with the
driverless cars making roadways more efficient, longer commutes may become
possible. Perhaps it would be reasonable
to commute from Petaluma to San Mateo on a daily basis if you can move along
briskly while responding to emails and voicemails during much of the commute.
Urbanism
should still progress under this path because there are an increasing number of
folks who are disposed toward a walkable urban lifestyle. But it wouldn’t receive the boost from a paradigm
shift in how we view our cars.
But the paradigm
shift could result if the need for a human to be behind the wheel can be
solved. If we can just hop into a back
seat, point our phone at a reader, speak our destination, and arrive
effortlessly, cars would effectively become taxis without the labor cost of a
cabbie. And probably far less expensive
than individual car ownership.
The
emotional connection between ourselves and our car would be severed for
many. We could live in places, whether
single-family or multi-family, without garages, as long as we remain close to a
place where driverless taxis can be rented.
Or perhaps taxis could be dispatched from an automotive livery stable to
our addresses.
Freed from
the requirement to provide parking, urbanism could thrive, creating settings in
which more people would want to live.
Two very
different paths. I hope I’m alive to see
which we take and where it leads us.
Although I also wouldn’t be surprised to find that technology points us toward
a third path of which I haven’t conceived.
The future often works that way.
It should be
noted that the driverless technology has little impact on the other looming
issue for the automobile, the use of hydrocarbons. I would expect that driverless technology to
result in slight mileage improvements, but not enough to greatly change the
looming hydrocarbon issues.
The
increasing use of electrical vehicles is a good thing, but in much of the
country coal-fired generation remain the baseload electrical supply, so the
energy source remains hydrocarbon.
Increased
use of solar, wind, and other “green” technology is also positive, but remains
a long way from covering all of our electrical needs, especially if we continue
moving more of our automotive energy needs onto the electrical grid.
Unless
scientists and engineers can find a solution to the automotive energy issue, it
could become the ultimate limit to car usage, despite all the resources of
Google.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment