I don’t know
if people give honest responses to polls like this. I suspect that a generous concern for the
common good expressed to a polltaker may convert into penuriousness once inside
the voting booth. But I don’t know how
else a city can begin to take the temperature of the electorate.
However, I’m
disappointed that the polling questions stopped where they did.
The
questions about services to be funded, alternative sales tax increments, and
duration of the tax were all appropriate.
But doesn’t it seem that the poll would have been the perfect opportunity to ask about removing institutional barriers to urbanism, a land use alternative that is less expensive to maintain, reducing the need for future tax increases?
Not asking
it was akin to going to the bank for a loan to host your eighth keg party of
the month and not having your banker suggest that you might want to adjust your
lifestyle.
I’m not
sufficiently naïve to believe that simply asking a question about voter
interest in urbanism would have immediately changed the course of Petaluma
history. But it might have begun a
dialogue that would have been both fact-based and achingly appropriate.
Nor is
Petaluma the only place where the dialogue is needed. Many cities seem to have financial
projections for the next decade and beyond that are just as bad or worse than
Petaluma’s. And yet we struggle to begin
the conversation about alternatives.
For the
record, I wasn’t one of the people polled for the ballot measure. But I expect to support any ballot measure
that the City Council may be put forth.
I may be disappointed at how much infrastructure we’ve accumulated, but believe
that it’s nonetheless our responsibility to maintain that infrastructure for
the generations that will follow. Just
as it’s our responsibility to find a way to live good lives with less
infrastructure, so those generations aren’t as overburdened as we are.
(I might
have questioned whether a sales tax is the appropriate mechanism for raising
additional revenue, but that topic is getting a bit far afield from urbanism.)
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment