For the past
few months, Petaluma Urban Chat has been reading “The Smart Growth Manual” by
Andres Duany, Jeff Speck, and Mike Lydon.
Unfortunately, our discussions were disjointed because we had several speakers
scheduled over the same period.
It was a
shame that we couldn’t focus more effectively because the book is worth the
effort. With tight and cogent one-page
descriptions of 138 key elements of urbanism, it’s a marvel of editing. It’s a book to which one can and should
return frequently for quick refreshers.
It’s also
hard to find a single page which doesn’t trigger insights about our built
environment.
To give an example,
Page 9.6 addresses sidewalk obstructions.
It proposes that every sidewalk have four distinct zones, a curb zone
where bumpers overhang or car doors open, a furnishing zone where street trees,
utility boxes, streetlights, and trash cans are sited, a walking zone that is
be kept clear for pedestrians, and a frontage zone for benches or sidewalk
dining. It’s a commonsensical approach
and, the authors do a fine job of putting common sense in a clear, concise
language.
One would
hope that everyone would agree with the approach. But look at the sidewalk in the photo. It’s a mess.
To begin,
the columns for the overhang were angled inward into what should have been the
walking zone. It’s unclear why they were
angled, perhaps it was an architect who valued quirky aesthetics over
walkability. But vertical columns would have
put the footings in the furnishings zone, where they belonged.
Given the encroachment
into the walking zone, the restaurant owner made a reasonable adjustment, putting
a table in what should been the furnishing zone. But on the far side of the awning, further tables return to what should been the frontage zone.
With the
walking zone weaving back and forth, it makes pedestrians feel like broken
field runners. One of the four essential
elements of walkability noted by Speck in his “Walkable City” is comfort, a sense
of being in the right place and belonging there. This zigzag walking zone surely undermines
the comfort of the sidewalk.
And then there’s
the bench. Rather than being in frontage
zone where sitters could look for arriving friends, it’s flipped around and placed in the furnishing zone, where sitters can only look at the diners in the
restaurant and wonder if a parking car is about to jump the curb and hit them
from behind.
I know that
it’s only a shopping center and that a bad sidewalk allocation won’t have much
impact on whether people shop there, but walkability is about getting the
details right. This is a setting in
which the details are most assuredly gotten wrong.
Schedule Notes
Petaluma
Urban Chat: The next Petaluma Urban Chat
meeting will be tomorrow evening, Tuesday, February 11. We’ll convene at 5:30 at the Aqus Cafe at 2nd
and H Streets. The discussion will begin
at 5:45.
With our
reading of “The Smart Growth Manual’ at an end, we’ll be selecting our next book. If you enjoy this blog, please join us.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment