I describe
this blog as a perspective, with an urbanist eye, on land use in the entire
North Bay. However, I live, work, and participate
in the Petaluma community. Unless I
watch myself carefully, I can easily find myself writing only about Petaluma. Lately, I haven’t been watching myself
carefully.
That became
evident when I began to write updates on several stories I’ve been
following. All of the stories were based
in Petaluma. Oops.
I promise in
the near future to again begin traveling beyond the Petaluma city limits. At least I’ll do so as soon as the broken
glass is swept up. (For those not in the
Bay Area, the North Bay sustained a 6.0 earthquake early Sunday morning. The entire household was awakened, except for
the 14-year-old Golden Retriever who continued to snore blissfully. We sustained no damage, not even a picture
askew, but the towns of Napa and Sonoma weren’t as lucky.)
I have a
working list of projects which I intend to visit around the North Bay. But if readers have particular projects they’d
like me to visit, or public hearings they think I should attend, let me
know. I’m always interested in inside
information.
So, today
will be a summing up of older Petaluma stories.
My next post will be final thoughts on the athletic field at the River
Front project in Petaluma (where else?) about which I’ve recently written twice. And
then I’ll take a quick look at planning in England. But after that, I promise, I’ll widen my
perspective to include more of the North Bay.
Fairgrounds:
As I’ve previously written, there will be a special
meeting of Petaluma Urban Chat this coming Tuesday, August 26th. We’ll continue our independent analysis of
the redevelopment options for the Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds. Several members are preparing sketches for
sharing and discussion. The meeting will
be at the Aqus Café at 2nd and H Streets.
We’ll begin at 5:30. Everyone is
welcome.
I’ve been
corresponding with a parent who has been active with the Live Oak Charter
School on the fairgrounds. She advised
me of several factors, including funding for improvements under the recently
passed Petaluma City Schools bond measures, that increase the likelihood that Live
Oak will remain in its current location.
Anyone who is preparing a sketch for Tuesday evening may want to include
Live Oak in its current setting on the Gnoss Concourse.
Block
parties: In response to my recent suggestion that
readers contact their favorite City Councilmembers to advocate for loosening
and clarifying the block party rules in the Petaluma Municipal Code, several
readers promised to do exactly that.
One faithful
reader even copied me on her emails to all seven Councilmembers. To their credit, six of the seven
responded. The messages ranged from
“That’s interesting” to “Let me look into it and see what I can do” to “Here
are some thoughts for making a change in 2015.”
I’m pleased
that she received responses, but would have preferred if at least one had been “Let’s
get this fixed right now!” Perhaps I was
hoping for too much, particularly during an election season. Plus, reduced City Hall staffing has an
effect on the speed of administrative changes, no matter how laudable. I’ll let this situation perk for awhile in
hopes that something develops. But
failing that, at least we have a plan for 2015.
Celebration
of Evening Bus Service: I haven’t yet seen the numbers, but suspect that
the celebration of Petaluma Transit evening bus service
was a failure to launch. I hung out near
the Boulevard Cinema for an hour in the early evening. I saw a few students hanging about, perhaps ready
to take advantage of the reduced admission charge, but it was far short of a critical
mass.
The failure
is disappointing. Not so much because of
the time spent by transit staff in organizing the event or the post that I
devoted to the subject, but because the community needs strong transit service,
including evening service. And because local
students need to achieve transit comfort to reach their full potential in the
21st century.
However, as
Thomas Edison was reported to have said upon the failure of another light bulb
concept, we’ve haven’t failed as much as we’ve found another idea that doesn’t work. We’ll take a step back, reassess the opportunities,
and try again. And we’ll eventually
succeed.
Keller
Court Commons: I previously wrote of this pocket neighborhood project that
would bring an alternative and more compact land use pattern to Petaluma. In my post, I noted my disappointment that the
zoning code required the project to become a planned unit development (PUD), arguing
that the additional hurdle shouldn’t have been required for the more benign
land use.
The project easily
secured its first Planning Commission approvals a couple of weeks ago. Afterwards, I finally met the developer
face-to-face. He hadn’t seen my post,
but among his first comments was astonishment that he’d needed to form a PUD,
noting that no other community in which he’d worked required more than a
conditional use.
It was great
that Petaluma was able to approve Keller Court Commons. It was less great that the city made the process
more difficult than elsewhere.
Next time, I’ll
conclude my thoughts on the athletic field at River Front in Petaluma.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment