I’ve written
twice about the unofficial look being taken at the future of the Sonoma Marin
Fairgrounds by Petaluma Urban Chat. Previous
posts have covered the original decision to look at the fairgrounds and about the results of the first meeting.
The second
meeting has now been held and I have multiple updates to offer.
To begin,
the makeup of this group for the second meeting time was somewhat different,
with slightly different perspectives on where peak value could be found. Gaining different perspectives is always good. I missed some of the voices that participated
in the July meeting, but understand that August vacation plans intervened.
To begin,
the group took two site possibilities off the table. The convention center concept was dropped
because of a concern about financial viability of convention centers in
general. One participant noted a recently published book on the subject.
The ballpark
idea was also discarded. Although there
was broad approbation of the concept of a ballpark in Petaluma, it was felt
that the fairgrounds didn’t provide a good ballpark site. Or at least that there were better uses for the
fairgrounds.
Balancing
the deletions, it was noted that a cannery should be considered among the
agri-industrial uses possible on the site.
Also, there was a strong sense that any residential development should
be very environmentally sensitive, with the phrase “eco-village” used.
As a personal
aside, this last makes me slightly uncomfortable. It’s certainly not that I disapprove of
environmentally friendly development.
However, as I’ve often noted before, much of the environmental benefit
of urbanism comes from living in sufficient density to allow walkability. I wouldn’t want the eco-village concept to
interfere with that.
To put my
concern another way, I suspect that eschewing individual at-grade garden plots and
instead increasing density and buying produce from the local Green Strings Farms might be
the better environmental solution. I
wouldn’t want a commitment to the eco-village concept to interfere with an
objective determination of the best environmental solution. (Of course, rooftop gardening is a whole
different matter.)
Next, the
group decided to focus on redevelopment of the entire site, with the assumption
that the fairgrounds would be relocated to a new site. One participant suggested that new
fairgrounds in a rural setting could incorporate groundwater recharge as
response to the drought.
Personally,
I suspect that the final solution between the City and the Fair Board will involve the fair
remaining in place, albeit in a smaller footprint, but also believe that any
visions put forth by Urban Chat can be scaled to the smaller redevelopment
area.
Lastly,
Urban Chat, in looking for a way for the local community to have a role in the
fairgrounds redevelopment, proposed a “citizens corporation”, perhaps a hundred
or more members of the local community buying shares in a corporation which
would loan the funds to the city, allowing the city to act as the master
developer for the site.
Personally,
I see much value in giving the community a strong voice and role in the redevelopment. But I’m unsure if a citizens corporation
quite hits the mark. Development is a
high-risk, high-reward, quickly pivoting activity. I’m pretty sure that a hundred individual local
citizens, filtered through City Hall, doesn’t meet that characterization. Instead, it might be like trying to win the
America’s Cup racing a Petaluma River scow schooner.
I believe in
strong local involvement, but suspect that we haven’t yet found the best
mechanism.
With those
discussions behind us, the consensus was to begin putting pencil to paper. But instead of doing it as a group activity, the
decision was to prepare individual site sketches for consideration at the next
Urban Chat meeting. Furthermore, to keep
the ball rolling, the group decided to hold an extra meeting, on Tuesday,
August 26, to monitor progress. (I haven’t
yet confirmed with Aqus Café about availability on the 26th, so we may need to
use a different meeting place. I’ll soon
make an announcement.)
Even if you
haven’t yet attended one of the Urban Chat meetings on the fairgrounds, there
is still plenty of opportunity to jump in. Please take a look at the early posts and
email me if you have any questions.
Can Urban
Chat truly influence the future of the Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds? Probably not.
It’s a complex, multi-faceted, high-risk, high-reward problem and our
resources are virtually non-existent.
But someone
offered a famous Margaret Mead quote at the July meeting that applied
perfectly. “Never doubt that a small
group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the
only thing that ever has.”
And more
recently, I came across another quote that also spoke to the challenge, “No
matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change the world." The speaker of that sentiment? Robin Williams.
I look
forward to seeing the creative results on August 26th.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment