A couple of
posts ago, I wrote about two alternative paths to strategize the transition from
suburbia to urbanism. The dichotomy I suggested
was a grand vision versus incremental steps, between motivating the public with
the big vision of where urbanism will eventually lead and motivating them with
the next incremental step on the path toward the long-term goal.
Although I acknowledged
the appeal of a big vision, I feared the disillusionment of proponents when the
vision seems always to recede toward the horizon. Therefore, I described myself as an
incrementalist. That doesn’t mean that I
abjure the grand vision, indeed this blog regularly touches upon grand visions,
but means that I believe progress is made more effectively when we focus on the
next step, not the destination.
As often
happens, I had barely published the post when a quote arrived in my email that
caused me to further ponder the question.
“If you don't like the way the world
is, you change it. You have an
obligation to change it. You just do it
one step at a time." - Marian Wright Edelman
Edelman’s words
provide a fine counterpoint to a quote of which all urban planners are
aware.
“Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men's blood and
probably will not themselves be realized.” - Daniel Burnham
Who of the
two is correct? Both of them are. But to my way of thinking Edelman’s truth is
the more effective truth.
It’s
informative to compare the careers of the two.
Burnham
is likely the more familiar name. He designed
one of the first steel frame buildings, The
Rookery (pictured above), one of the first skyscrapers, the Monadnock
Building, and the 1893 Columbian Exposition, which changed the
course of architecture and urban design, and is often considered the standard
against which all future world fairs should be measured. (In an example of how urban planning can
change lives, cases can also be made that the Columbian Exposition led to “The
Wizard of Oz” and Disneyland.)
After the
Columbian Exposition, Burnham turned with enthusiasm toward urban planning,
triggering the City Beautiful campaign, an international movement
toward improving the aesthetics of cities.
The goal of City Beautiful was to enhance municipal function and to
cultivate civic virtue. It was about the
City Beautiful ideal that Burnham offered his thoughts about “no little plans”.
The problem
is that, while the City Beautiful movement had successes such as the National
Mall in Washington, D.C, the vast extent of most of the City Beautiful visions
made their execution impossible. In a
typical story, Burnham had delivered a City Beautiful plan to the City of San
Francisco when the 1906 earthquake struck.
Despite having an unexpectedly blank slate on which to work, the City focused
on rebuilding rather than vision and Burnham’s plan remained on the shelf.
By the time
of Burnham’s death in 1912, the City Beautiful movement was already fading.
In
comparison, Edelman, an American activist for
disadvantaged and disabled children, particularly those who are minorities,
remained focused on incremental improvement.
As the founder of the Children’s
Defense Fund, she had a vision, but her daily life was about making the
incremental steps needed to make children’s lives better. Nearing her 80th birthday, she continues to
be productive.
When running
a race, or trying to reach a base safely in baseball, there is a temptation to
take an extra long leap for the final stride.
Despite studies conclusively showing that the better strategy is to
maintain stride through the tape, the intuition to leap is hard to
overcome. Burnham leaped for the tape,
while Edelman has maintained stride.
Both Burnham
and Edelman lived exemplary lives. We
could use more of each. But as urbanists,
I think we do better to emulate Edelman, never forgetting the ultimate goal, but
focused on maintaining stride.
Although not
immediately, I’ll soon look at a couple of Petaluma situations from the
incremental step versus grand vision perspective.
Meanwhile, my
next post will touch upon my old grievance about “infrastructure investment”.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment