After a
one-month hiatus to chat with City Council candidate Dave King about Measure Q,
Petaluma Urban Chat will return to the subject of the Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds
for the November meeting and hopefully onward into 2015.
For newer
readers, the City of Petaluma owns the 63-acre site currently occupied by the
Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds. The Fair Board
makes a minimal annual payment to the City under a lease that will expire in
2023. The City and the Fair Board have
been holding closed meetings for over a year to discuss the use of the
Fairgrounds after 2023.
The primary
alternatives seem to be that the Fairgrounds remains in its current location,
presumably with a greater lease amount, that the Fair is displaced to a new
site with the City redeveloping the current site, and that some combination of
the two is defined by which the Fair would remain in its current location but
within a smaller footprint, freeing up some land for redevelopment.
Of course, each
of the choices are tangled in various real world complications, including the
financial performance of the current Fair operation, the financial capability
of the Fair Board to develop a new site, the ongoing non-fair uses of the
Fairgrounds, such as the Live Oak charter school, the hazardous materials
cleanup that may be required within the Fairgrounds, the presence of historical
elements within the Fairgrounds that must be preserved under the law, the range
of boundary conditions around the site, and the need of the City to generate
income to bolster sagging municipal finances.
It’s a
complex problem. Of course, it’s also an
incredible opportunity. To my knowledge,
there won’t be another other opportunity within our lifetimes to reinvent the
core of a North Bay city with a blank slate of this size. Petalumans should be greatly invested in the
process, but so should all residents of the North Bay, because what Petaluma
does with the Fairgrounds can be a template for land-use decisions throughout
the North Bay.
For that
reason, Petaluma Urban Chat has been trying for months to come to grips with
the site opportunities, constraints, and best alternatives. I’m sure the Fairgrounds has been the subject
of numerous informal but concerned conversations throughout the community but,
to my knowledge, no other group except the City and Fair Board negotiating teams
has been trying as hard to put pencil to paper to devise a new vision for the
site.
However, I
describe the Urban Chat efforts as “trying” because the process thus far has
been challenging and not particularly successful. We did well in identifying the range of site
options, but then struggled to find consensus.
Part of the
problem was that the changing cast of attendees at each meeting. Not only did every meeting require a recap of
earlier discussions, but new folks were constantly putting new ideas on the
table.
Part of the
problem was the lack of a good facilitator, which was my deficiency.
But the
biggest part of the problem was trying to conduct the process with short
monthly meetings and zero budget. By
comparison, the planning for the Petaluma Station Area, adjoining the future Petaluma
SMART station, began with a three-day public charrette, continued for another
year of public meetings, involved an award-winning planning firm from Berkeley,
and had a budget of nearly a half-million dollars. And the planning area was about one-fifth the
size of the Fairgrounds site.
However,
perhaps we can make a virtue out of our lack of funds, absence of expertise,
and occasional meetings.
I’ve
conceived an approach by which to reboot the Urban Chat study of the
Fairgrounds. By the very nature of our deficiency
of resources, skills, and time, it won’t look like the Station Area
process. But it can hopefully be
effective in its own way.
However, I need
your assistance. First, I need to know
how many folks expect to attend the next three Urban Chat meetings, which will
be on November 11, December 9, and January 13.
No one will come to your home and abuse you if you answer in the
affirmative and then miss a meeting, but I do want a good faith commitment for
the three meetings.
I doubt we’ll
complete the effort in the three meetings, but I hope those meetings will
generate enough momentum and enthusiasm that attendance at further meetings won’t
require urging.
In terms of
how many people might participate, there’s no limit, but I’d like to have
thirty folks. I know that would be more
people than all but one previous Urban Chat meeting and bigger than can be readily
accommodated at the Aqus CafĂ©, but I’ll happily solve the space problem.
Also,
attendance needn’t be limited to Petalumans nor to people who have previously
attended an Urban Chat meeting. The
future use of the Fairgrounds can be a template for all of the North Bay, so
everyone is welcome to participate.
If being a
part of this effort is intriguing, let me know, either in the comments below or
by email.
Second, I’d
like a couple of people to work with me on a steering committee for the
reboot. My preference would be folks
with charrette experience, but anyone willing to put in a little extra effort would
be welcome. I’m thinking of a
coordination meeting on Monday, November 3.
Once again, let me know via comments or email.
The
effective reuse of the Fairgrounds can change the North Bay. Let’s make sure that our voices are heard.
As always, your
questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
Dave, I'm good for the two meetings remaining in this calendar year. In January, alas, I am back on Tuesday night class through May. I’m happy to assist in a way you’d like me to at the two meetings, but cannot attend a Monday session.
ReplyDeleteQuestion: my current pipe dream is a new City Hall at the fairgrounds, since I fear we will need a new one and I do not want it to move all the way across town. In choosing our home, part of our commitment to walkable urbanism was being able to participate in civic governance walkably — “Vote with your feet!” Still, I prefer that City Hall be no farther from downtown than it is now. Does that have merit beyond self-interest?
Barry
Barring any unforeseen circumstances, I should be able to make each of the three upcoming monthly meetings. Really looking forward to the discussions and recommendations that might follow. I agree, the new lease will present a real opportunity to potentially transform the true center of town.
ReplyDelete