I’ve recently
returned from the 23rd annual meeting of the Congress for the New
Urbanism. As always, I return wearied by
the long days crammed with information and insights, but full of enthusiasm and
new ideas that I’m eager to bring to bear on North Bay land-use issues.
My plan is
for CNU 23 to dominate this blog over the next few weeks, but not to the exclusion
of North Bay thinking. I’ll try to walk
the fine line between sharing my experiences and keeping an eye on local stuff.
Today, I’ll begin
my thoughts from CNU 23. Next week, I’ll
offer a sampling of the best individual comments from the Congress, followed in
later weeks by deeper explorations of the content. But for today, I’ll write only about the
theme that struck me most forcibly at CNU 23.
In the past,
I’ve found the use of the word “Congress” to describe the group as a slightly
curious, although acceptable, word choice.
In my thinking, I was using the “assembly” definition of “congress”. But in a re-education that began with the
first session I attended, I was educated that “Congress” had been selection intended
in the more legislative sense.
A CNU
Congress is intended as a place where the best and most insightful thinkers
about land-use planning can gather to exchange perspectives, to seek common ground,
and to consider compromises that give the best syntheses for contemporary
urbanism.
(In a
humorous note that was made several times during CNU 23, it was remembered that
some of CNU founders thought that four Congresses should be sufficient to
reconcile any differences and to settle on a single approach to urbanism. Twenty-three Congresses have now been
completed, the next two are already being planned for Detroit and Seattle, and
the end of the Congresses is no longer discussed.)
My enhanced education
began with Professor Emily Talen talking about the four disparate philosophies
that have fed urbanism over the past century and continue to play roles
today. Her terms for the four streams
were incremental urbanism, regional planning, zoning, and garden cities. She traced the roots of each stream and then
described the role that each has assumed in contemporary urbanism, including
the tensions that remain between them.
This new and
more profound understanding of the past and future of urbanism isn’t
necessarily a comfortable place to be.
Talen’s vision of urbanism, although it includes bedrock principles, isn’t
of a single formulation that can universally applied, but of a philosophy that
must constantly evolve as new information is brought to the table and as new
situations are faced.
My personal
example of this thinking is the connection between climate change and
urbanism. Going back to the founding of
CNU, and in my own experience as recently as 2011 when this blog was started,
climate change has had a role in the urbanist conversation, but wasn’t necessarily
the central factor.
This relationship
between urbanism and climate change is now quickly changing, with climate
change becoming perhaps the strongest argument for new urbanism.
In the
abstract, I’m comfortable with this continual evolution although I find the
constant sense of motion to be unsettling at times.
Following
Talen, Andres Duany connected this on-going evolution to the CNU membership
tallies. As he described it, the
membership total of CNU remains stable at about 3,000 people despite an annual
influx of 500 new members.
Duany’s explanation
is that 500 people also depart each year, many because of a difficulty of accepting
the continual tension between the different urbanist streams. His belief is that many of the former CNU
members have instead joined groups that focus on single aspects of urbanism,
such as complete streets or public places.
Duany doesn’t
bemoan those who have moved on, but celebrates CNU as the place where cutting
edge thinking continues to happen.
I look
forward to sharing more about CNU 23 in the coming weeks.
Schedule Reminders
I have two calendar
reminders today.
As described
in my last post, the agenda for the upcoming
meeting of the Petaluma Transit Advisory Committee touches upon aspects of transit
funding and regional coordination beyond where the committee agendas often
go. As the committee chair, I can
promise discussions that will give grist for further thought. If this sounds interesting, please join
us. The meeting will be Thursday, May 7
at 4:00pm in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 11 English Street.
Also, the regular
monthly meeting of Petaluma Urban Chat will be Tuesday, May 12, 5:30pm at the
Aqus Café, 2nd and H Streets. I’m awaiting
a couple of final confirmations so can’t yet announce the subject, but am
planning a topic that I think will interest many. For now, please put the meeting on your
calendar and then look for more details two posts hence.
My next post
will come from my recent travels. My
route to Dallas, where CNU 23 was held and where the photo of the public art was taken, was circuitous. On my way to the Big D, I attended a family wedding
in West Virginia, took advantage of a spare day to watch a ballgame in and to
wander the downtown of Morgantown, and joined an old friend for an early evening
tour of Pittsburgh. The next post will
describe a public plaza in Pittsburgh that caught my attention, although not
necessarily in the way the designer intended.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment