Urbanist neighborhood near Portland, Oregon |
After many
years of writing this blog, it’s time to make some changes.
One of the most
pervasive bits of advice offered to wannabe writers is to write. Talking about the theories of rhetoric, of
plotting, of sentence structure, and of grammar all have their places, but experts
say that skill at writing only grows when pen is touching paper or fingers are
touching keyboard.
From my
earliest days of putting a No. 2 pencil to lined paper, I’ve believed the advice. And I’ve generally found it to be true,
whether as a high school student trying my hand at short stories, an engineer assembling
feasibility studies, or an urban advocate putting my thoughts into this space.
Although I’m
usually pleased when I look back at my earliest blogging efforts from back in
2011, finding that most of the posts has stood up well enough over time, I also
think I can discern that I’ve become a better writer, more aware of logical structure
and better capable of addressing the questions that readers will pose before
they have a chance to organize their thoughts.
(I have one reader in particular who often congratulates me on the latter
skill. His words never fail to please me.)
But I also recognize
that one skill has failed to grow. I find
myself increasingly incapable of producing words at an effective pace. Instead, as my ability to be cogent and
comprehensive has slowly grown, my ability to do so on the clock seems to have declined
at an even greater rate.
I publish three
new posts each week. And I haven’t missed
a single post in the history of this blog.
(In an oft-told story, a partner and I began this blog together, equally
sharing the writing task. Given the arrangement,
we adopted a three times weekly schedule to give enough new content to keep readers
coming back. The partner opted out
shortly after launch, my efforts to find a new partner have come to
naught, and I’ve written three times
each week by myself ever since. It was
never my plan, but here I am.)
I’m finding the
finishing the three posts increasingly difficult, a fact evidenced by my
publishing times. For a long time, 8:30am
was my target time for publishing. Then
I decided that any time before noon was acceptable. Then the afternoon, with the occasional evening,
became increasingly common. Most
recently, I’ve decided that I could live with any time before I retire for the
night. As a result, a couple of recent
posts have been published at 12:02am the day after my scheduled publishing day.
And it can
yet become worse. Even as I struggle
with timeliness, I can see that other factors, personal, familial,
professional, and civic, could soon crimp my writing time.
Meanwhile, I’m
becoming increasingly concerned that this blog is missing a key element of
urbanist advocacy. Most of what I write
is targeted toward opening people to the possibilities and benefits of
urbanism, with the goal that they become advocates for better land-use
planning. But even as I gain ground in
the educational effort, I find that readers are unsure what to do with the new
information, often unaware of how to convert new convictions into community change.
It’s not a
question with an easy answer because the pressure points where change can be
effected are often elusive. But the
first step is becoming familiar with the decision makers and the processes,
which means becoming involved and attending public meeting with urbanist
aspects.
To address
with these concerns about time devoted to writing while also providing the
information that readers need to help change their communities, I’ll be adding
three elements to this blog.
First, I’ll
write more posts that are more collections of links, although usually organized
around a single urbanist topic. I’d
planned one of these posts for today, but have already claimed too much of your
attention, so it’ll await my next post.
Second, I’ll
provide dates and times for meetings that citizen activists may wish to attend
for the land-use aspects. How well I can
track down all meetings in the North Bay is uncertain. Assistance from other folks in the North Bay
would be appreciated. As of today, the
list below includes a review of scheduled municipal meetings in Novato,
Petaluma, and Cotati, although next week will be a slow week for meetings at
city halls.
Third, I’ll note
other opportunities to become involved citizens.
I don’t yet
know how I fold these new elements into my current blend of posts. I have ideas, but will play with different
patterns over the next few weeks.
For today, my first lists of upcoming meetings
and other involvement opportunities are provided below.
Upcoming Meetings
Tuesday, May
24, 7:00, Cotati City Hall – The Cotati City Council meeting will include consideration
of a November ballot measure to extend the current Urban Growth Boundary
through 2048. It seems a mostly
uncontroversial proposal and is consistent with the already adopted General
Plan.
Wednesday,
June 8, 7:00, Aqus Café, 2nd and H Streets, Petaluma – Petaluma Urban Chat will discuss the Plan Bay
Area 2040 process that will set priorities for transportation funding.
Monday, June
13, 6:00, Luther Burbank Center for the Arts, Santa Rosa – MTC and ABAG will
host the Sonoma County open house for Plan Bay Area
2040.
Other Involvement Opportunities
City of Petaluma – The City is seeking volunteers for opening on City
Commissions and Committees.
California
Road Charge – Volunteers are being
sought to help conduct a pilot study on the use of vehicle
mileage charges to replace the gas tax.
(I’ve previously signed up.)
SMART – The SMART
Board is seeking
your thoughts on a fare structure. It’s a rather simple poll allowing folks to
easily support only the lower fares. But
before you vote, remember the higher fares will help toward extending the SMART
system and completing the bike-pedestrian path.
So there are
two of the new elements proposed for the blog.
The third will be introduced in my next post, when I provide several
links that try to answer the question “Why urbanism?”
Thanks for
being tolerant of the changes that I’m trying to make. I remain committed to urbanism, but need to
reduce the hours I spend at the keyboard, while also providing more direction
to readers on how to make a difference in their communities.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
These changes sound great and useful. Looking forward to reading more.
ReplyDeleteAdriann, I hope they're useful. I'll know when I start seeing more people participating in the process. Thanks for the comment.
Delete