Mixed-use building in downtown Tacoma |
Over the years
that I’ve advocated for urbanism, I’ve consistently written that I needn’t
argue for eventual return of walkable urbanism as the dominant paradigm because
the forces of history will make urbanism inevitable. Instead, I advocated for a quicker return to
urbanism to reduce the pain as the transition progressed.
I may have
been entirely too sanguine about anyone listening to the forces of history.
We’ve
reached the time when it seems the paradigm shift should be underway. After three years of deep California drought,
strongly tied to climate change, we’re finishing a barely average water year
despite indicators pointing toward a wet winter. With forests stressed by low precipitation,
wildfires are rampant.
Cities
everywhere, stressed by the costs of suburbia, are teetering on the precipice
of bankruptcy.
There is so
much dissatisfaction among the electorate that populist uprisings took hold on
both ends of the political spectrum during the presidential campaign, one of
which has apparently secured a major party nomination. (Admittedly, many of the surface causes cited
as the reasons for the resurgence of populism don’t tie immediately to
urbanism, but the roots of lingering segregation, income inequality, the
housing crisis, the inability of government to provide services, etc. are
entwined with the experiment and subsequent failure of drivable suburbia.)
By any measure,
we should be in the drivable suburban end-of-times. But that seems not to be the case.
A few
evenings ago, I bumped into a former Councilmember in my town while we were
both browsing in the downtown bookstore.
In the course of our conversation, I expressed my surprise at the lack
of concern within the electorate over the climate change and municipal
finances, two of many issues that should be pushing us toward urbanism. He responded that many folks don’t care “as
long as they can afford a tank of gas for their new SUV.” It was a bleak assessment, but seemingly
true.
It was same
message given by the community organizer to the local group that has been seeking an urbanist candidate for the council. As she described it, voters are still heading
to the polls asking “What’s in it for me tomorrow?” I understand that many are too focused on
putting food on the table and assembling money for rent to think much about the
longer term, but it was still a distressing message.
I continue
to believe that the return to urbanism is inevitable as the collapse of the
suburban model becomes so obvious that even the most otherwise preoccupied can’t
miss it. But it seems that the bankruptcy
courts and Mother Nature must swing a larger piece of lumber before we listen.
Which is a
shame because it’d be easier for all if we’d listen now.
My next post
will be the weekly summary of urbanist public advocacy opportunities.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment