Public plaza in Paris |
I was
particularly distressed by last week’s attack on Nice’s Promenade des Anglais. The sorrow was sharp because the attack occurred
in a walkable urban place, a place described by CityLab as “an elegant Belle Époque version of the
Atlantic City Boardwalk”, a place filled with folks in a celebratory mood.
(Although as
I write this it remains undetermined whether the attacker in Nice was
affiliated with a terrorist organization, it seems moderately clear that he was
a Muslim by birth and was likely using Muslim discontent as a justification for
his actions, even if the specific motivation for the attack fell elsewhere. These likely facts inform my comments below.)
Giving form
to my thoughts on the attack provided an unexpected and uncomfortable reminder
of recent history.
I recalled
having written a post on a similar subject, but couldn’t remember which attack had
triggered the post. So I embarked on a
search of my archives, trying to recall the target. It wasn’t the concert hall or soccer stadium
in Paris. It wasn’t the Orlando night
club. It wasn’t the airports in either
Istanbul or Brussels. It wasn’t the
classroom in Newtown or the conference room in San Bernardino.
I finally
found it. It was the Boston
Marathon. Those were far too many incidents
of which to be reminded.
At least to
my ear, my earlier article has stood up well. I’d change a word or two, but not the
underlying message. However, there are
further lessons that could have been gleaned from the crimes at the Boston Marathon
and in Nice, lessons that I didn’t elucidate in the earlier post. Those were omissions I’ll correct today.
One of the
responses to the Nice attack, admittedly a lesser response but still heard, is
that public places have become unsafe, that private homes, preferably far from
the urban core, are the only truly secure places.
It’s a
response that’s tone-deaf on at least two levels.
First, the oil
needed to sustain the drivable suburban model, the model that created many of
the remote private homes that some would now call our only refuges, has been a primary
cause of Muslim unrest. It’s true that
the Israeli problem would have roiled the Middle East regardless and that the
transition to modern democracy is never easy, but the perceptions that the West
was only interested in the Middle East because of its oil and that many
geopolitical decisions made by the West were driven by that interest were major
destabilizing factors.
To suggest doubling
down on the suburban model in response to tragic events triggered in part by
the model is remarkably insensitive and unhelpful.
Second, one
of the arguments used by extremists to radicalize moderates is that the Muslims
will never be truly accepted into the Western world.
Assimilation
is never easy. We have many examples in
the U.S. to prove that point. But
assimilation from behind the locked front doors of suburban fortresses is
impossible.
To
effectively combat the radical propaganda, we must rub shoulders on sidewalks,
at restaurants, and in marketplaces with those who are different than us.
Taking a
break from public places in the aftermath of Nice is understandable, but
returning to those places after a short respite is essential if we’re to move
past our era of fear.
I’ve never
thought of visiting Nice, thinking myself more suited to wander the sidewalks
of London, Paris, or Venice, but the events of last week may cause me to
reconsider. Hanging out on the Promenade
des Anglais in Nice, exchanging smiles with strangers, suddenly seems a
desirable way to spend an afternoon.
Hopefully,
many of you feel the same.
On a
personal note, I’ll be traveling for my next seven publishing days. Given that my plate of urbanist activities has
recently become well filled, I considered taking a break from writing. But I couldn’t bring myself to break a skein
of three posts per week that now goes back more than four-and-a-half
years. So, I’ve written, or will soon write,
the posts that will cover my absence.
They’ll be published automatically as the regular publishing days
arrive.
Most of the
posts will be shorter than my regular posts, which is probably a good
thing. I’ve been advised that the
desirable length for a blog post is 650 to 1,000 words, long enough to convey a
clear message but short enough not to require a major time commitment from the
reader. However, I struggle with the
upper end, often writing beyond the 1,000-word limit. Recently, I’ve been saving up some ideas that
can be addressed in fewer words and will use them during my travels, bringing my
long-term average slightly closer to the desired range.
Lastly, I
may struggle to serve those of you who are accustomed to being alerted to my new
posts by Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or email notices. With a travel computer that is wheezing its
way to obsolescence, uncertain hotel wifi, and a full schedule of activities, I
may not be able to hit all of my noticing goals. But I’ll do the best I can, while also
encouraging you to visit my primary
site each Monday, Wednesday, and Friday even if no notices
are received.
(And if you’d
like to begin receiving email notices of new blog posts, please send me an
email, although you may not get the full value of the request until after I
return.)
In my next
post, which will publish as I’m winging my way to my comfortably walkable paternal
hometown in Ohio, I’ll ponder our failure to turn more quickly toward urbanism
despite many signs that we should be doing so.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment