Some blog
posts, including ones I thought were insightful and original, quickly fade in
the rearview mirror of time. Others,
often to my surprise, gather speed in the weeks after publication, with new
readers, feedback, and information on the topic arriving regularly.
(By reader
count, my most popular post ever, by a factor of ten, was a comparison of Savannah and Charleston. One forum that linked the post even included
a discussion about whether I was African-American. I’m not.
I found it a good post, but not one I would have predicted to have
gained legs.)
Four recent
posts have shown signs of achieving longevity.
One of those, on parklets, is garnering enough comment to justify
its own follow-up post. I’ll offer updates
on the other three below.
“Show
Me a Hero”: Although a couple of people disclosed plot points, no one
invited me into their home to watch the HBO show “Show Me a Hero”.
That’s okay; I can wait until the DVD is available. Instead, I acquired the book on which the
show was based and finished reading it a few days back.
I found it
an oddly paced book, although not the fault of the author. The true story had its climax in the opening
act, after the City Council of Yonkers, New York defies a judicial order to
implement a public housing plan that would unwind some of the systemic
segregation in the community. Once the
climax is reached, which like most opposition to judicial edicts occurred with
more of a whimper than a bang, the remainder of the book is about the mundane
details of implementing the housing plan.
It was as if
the latter half of the book was an extended epilogue, although the thread of
the tragedy referred to by the title, extracted from the F. Scott Fitzgerald
quote “Show me a hero and I’ll write you a tragedy”, continued to wend its way
through the later chapters.
For readers
who want action, they can probably stop reading after the first 150 pages. But for those who care about the personal
stories within a desegregation effort, the latter half may be more meaningful
than the retelling of the city council rebellion. It’s a reminder that desegregation isn’t
about moving checkers around on a board; it’s about real lives being disrupted,
some for the better and some for the worse.
I expect HBO
has added more suspense to the latter elements of the story, which will make
for good television. But I think author
Lisa Belkin’s more spare telling of the stories of individual lives will be the
version that stays with me.
Racial
desegregation won’t be an issue in many, if any, North Bay communities. But urbanism, especially if inclusionary
housing continues to strengthen its foothold, will force economic
desegregation. Hence, the story of
Yonkers and a similar if less confrontation story from Cincinnati, where
strategic urbanist investments have begun putting a dent into
what some have called hypersegregation, could have application to the North
Bay.
Travel
Lane Widths: In an earlier post, I suggested that reduced lane widths could
reduce speeds in a Petaluma neighborhood that was anxious about traffic safety
relative to new development. I’ve since been
advised that city staff is taking a hard look at reducing the lane widths as
suggested.
Demonstrating
the worthiness of the concept, Eric Jaffe, writing in CityLab, summarized recent findings
showing that traffic collisions are reduced, both in number and in
severity, at the lower traffic speeds that occur as a result of narrower lanes.
Jaffe then
continued, also in CityLab, with a story from New Brunswick, New Jersey where a
City Council deferred implementation of reduced lane widths in
fear of a negative response from drivers.
Instead, when a child was hit by a car, the negative response came from
children and their parents demanding the narrower lanes for improved pedestrian
safety. A subsequent analysis found that
the lane width change could also be justified economically, with the value of
reduced pedestrian injuries outweighing the cost of slightly longer drive times.
But before
anyone assumes that reduced lane widths, with the resulting potential for
bicycle lanes, are an easy sell, Jaffe had a third story where a disgruntled
segment of the population in Coronado, California rallied to oppose bicycle lane striping as “paint
pollution”. My favorite among the
dubious arguments against the plan is the woman who argues that painting
stripes on her streets is akin to doing full body tattoos on her
daughters. The City Council in the
otherwise bike friendly city listened to the objectors and deferred the
striping.
Lane width
reductions remain a great idea, for the Petaluma neighborhood and elsewhere,
but there will be pockets of resistance.
Healdsburg
versus Tobacco: I’ll finish with an update on the City of Healdsburg’s
effort to increase the minimum age for the purchase of tobacco to 21. I lauded the action , in part because I believe
that 21-year-olds would make better tobacco decisions than 18-year-olds, but
mostly I applaud any effort by a city to follow a path independent of the laws
coming down from Washington, D.C. and Sacramento, an independence that could be
crucial to urbanism.
Unfortunately, the tobacco issue is about to
become costly for Healdsburg, with the National Association of Tobacco Outlets,
fearing a spread of the higher minimum age to other cities, threatening a lawsuit over the city action.
The costs of
a legal defense wouldn’t be coming out of my property taxes, so it probably
isn’t fair for me to write this, but I hope that Healdsburg holds to their
course, both for the principle of reduced access to tobacco and for the
precedent of municipal independence.
I’ll get
back to the question of parklets, which may be the most interesting of the
follow-ups, in the next week or so.
Many posts
ago, I looked at the question of the economic catalyzing potential of sports
facilities. I suspected that the
potential was neither huge, as the proponents of public-funded facilities would
argue, nor non-existent, as those who oppose all public funds would argue.
A recent
trip gave me a chance to look at the economic development potential of a number
of minor league ballparks. I’ll give my
thoughts on the variety of settings and results in the next post.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment