The Petaluma
City Council holds an annual goal-setting session, a seven-hour Saturday
marathon that was conducted a few days ago.
Several
Councilmembers occasionally follow this blog, but I still thought it appropriate
to remind the Council about some of the goals I’ve suggested for Petaluma over
past few years, while also noting a couple of more recent opportunities.
Following is
the text of the comments that I had intended to make at the goal-setting
session a few days ago. I write “intended”
because the Mayor, in a justified effort to keep the day on schedule, reduced
the time allotted to each speaker from the three minutes that I had expected to
only two minutes. It was a change that
so flustered me that I dropped my notes on the head of the Economic Development
Director. Upon recovery, I was able to
adjust my presentation on the fly, hitting all seven points below, but reducing
my intention from advocacy of a solution to identification of the issue.
Nonetheless,
I’ll share my entire intended presentation below.
“I
appreciate the opportunity to offer some thoughts this morning. I’ll try to make good use of my three
minutes.
“#1 - The
SMART train is now less than two years from arriving. And yet the key parcel of land that should serve
the station, providing homes for those who choose to use the train for a daily
commute, sits filled with railroad construction materials. Nor, based on the most recent information
I’ve received, has SMART even begun seeking a developer for the site. The only small concession that SMART has
reportedly made is to plan a gravel parking lot for some of the hoped-for
riders.
“Petaluma is
a cool place. SMART can make it
cooler. But for that to happen, the
town must have the elements in place to facilitate the change, including
transit-oriented development on the SMART parcel.
“I
understand that the burden lies with SMART.
But I ask the City to push SMART in every way possible to let the train
make Petaluma a cooler place.
“#2 – Moving
a block further from the train station, I understand that the new project on
the Haystack Landing site is moving nicely through the conceptual design
process. I ask the City to facilitate
the project in every way possible. A
constructed project on the Haystack Landing site isn’t a substitute for
development on the SMART parcel, but it’s a start.
“Also, I
understand that the Haystack Landing project currently excludes one of the
warehouses at the D Street corner because the two parties have been unable to
reach agreement on price. But if the
warehouse site is excluded from the project, the SMART Code may result in the
site being forever under-utilized.
“I
understand that City resources are limited, but this situation is why eminent
domain exists. Securing the warehouse
site for the Haystack Landing project is a win-win-win opportunity. The Haystack developer would have a better
project. The warehouse owners, even if
they don’t see it today, would benefit.
And the community would have a more complete development to pass onto
posterity.
“#3 – Moving
just slightly further from the SMART station, only four short blocks away is the Sonoma Marin Fairgrounds. I know the lease with the Fair Board doesn’t
expire for another eight years, but eight years can pass awfully quickly in
land use.
“I’m working
with a citizens group that has been developing design concepts for the
Fairgrounds. We expect to have a plan to
share publicly within six weeks.
“It’s time
to open the Fairgrounds process to the public, both for those who have been
studying the possibilities and for those eager to become educated about the
opportunities.
“The
Fairgrounds has the potential to transform Petaluma. Let’s begin the public discussion.
“#4 – One of
the best land-use efforts in the past year has been the progress of the Keller Court Commons community. It’s not a footprint that I’d support
throughout the community, but it’s a great adaption to a challenging site and
will provide a fine living experience for the its residents.
“However,
I’ve chatted with the developer and learned that the Petaluma entitlement
process was more difficult and convoluted than in any other city where he’s
done similar projects.
“We should
remedy that. A complete upgrade to the
zoning code to facilitate new and creative land-use ideas should be
undertaken. Once again, I know dollars
are tight, but this is a matter of preparing the community for the 21st
century.
“#5 – It’s
been over two years since the Transit Advisory Committee realized to its
surprise that the East Washington Place shopping center was nearing completion without a new bus stop. The TAC suggestion of a bus stop condition of
approval had been waylaid because the committee lacked the official power to
propose conditions of approval.
“The TAC,
Transit Manager, City Engineer, and developer rolled up sleeves and found a
solution. It was an imperfect solution,
one that required purchasing more buses and that continues to inconvenience
riders to this day, but it was better than having no bus stop.
“The TAC
then moved onto the next task, securing for themselves the authority to propose
conditions of approval to avoid future missteps. But after two years and numerous discussions,
the topic still hasn’t reached the City Council. This task must be completed in 2015. Transit will be too much a part of Petaluma’s
future not to give it a voice in land-use planning.
“#6 – To
conclude with an easier challenge, block parties still occupy a fuzzy role
within the Municipal Code, officially prohibited in most locations, but often
proceeding anyway. The responses that
potential organizers receive when asking for party approval from City officials
range from “No way” to “Well, okay, as long as you don’t tell anyone I said so”,
depending on the official to whom the organizer speaks.
“The range
of responses is unfortunate, but what’s even worse is that none of the
responses serve the city. The best
response should be “As long as public safety in ensured, we strongly encourage
block parties.” Let’s make the changes
to the Municipal Code to get to that best response.
“Thanks for
your time and attention.
“P.S. (if
time permits) #7 – Parking may be the biggest challenge in trying to reclaim
our cities from the automobile. The
final report on the Station Area Plan notes the need for a parking management
plan, an action that other cities have taken to great benefit. It’s time for the City, whether through staff
or with a committee of citizens, to begin thinking about long-term parking
strategies.”
The
remainder of the day was long and stultifying.
I was the only member of the public to remain the entire time. As I explained to a Councilmember after the
session, every time I grew tired of the warm room and the roar of the air
conditioning system, I looked down the agenda, spotted something of interest
perhaps 20 minutes away, and decided I could stay a bit longer.
Of the
issues I raised, all were touched upon by the City Council during their
discussions, although some references were more oblique than others. There were a number of Fairgrounds comments,
which I’ll share another time. Although
I suspect my positions of advocacy, both at the session and before, had helped
shape the discussion, I felt that only one issue was discussed solely because I’d
pushed it there.
And that issue
was block parties. I’m convinced that my
repeated comments on the value of clarifying the block party rules, and the
dogged efforts of one reader to keep the issue in front of the City Council,
were the only reasons that block parties were discussed near the end of the
day.
And the outcome
was favorable, with the Police Chief and much of the City Council declaring their
support for block parties. However, the
Council was uncertain about the best role for the City to take, so tossed the
issue back to the City Manager for further staff consideration. I’ll continue my involvement on the topic.
Similarly, I’ll
continue my advocacy on the other issues I raised. Saturday provided a few glimmers of hope for
urbanism but, as always, further work remains to be done.
Next time,
I’ll return to the “Intro to Urbanism”, exploring the role of buildings in
urbanism.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment