I’ve previously written that I recently attended
the 23rd annual meeting of the Congress for the New Urbanism. As was also true of the previous CNU conferences
I attended, CNU 23 was filled with moments of illuminating insight.
Today, I’ll
begin offering a few of those gems of urbanist thinking, along with a bit of
elucidation as required. It’s a path
that I’ll follow for several posts.
Sixty-Eight
Percent versus Four Percent: I don’t
recall who first noted the 68 percent versus 4 percent dichotomy, but it doesn’t
matter. It seemed that every other
speaker had his or her own version of the statistic which pointed to the same
issue, which is that 68 percent of the American public report that they would
like to live in a walkable setting, yet only 4 percent of the current housing
stock has a WalkScore of 80 or above.
Admittedly,
there are a number of holes that one can poke in the statistic. Perhaps some of the respondents expressed a
preference for walkability along with a desire for a three-car garage or a home
on a cul-de-sac, both of which can inhibit walkability. Perhaps the WalkScore threshold of 80 was set
too high. (I live in a home with a
WalkScore of 63. My walkable retail
options are limited, but schools for all grades from K through 12 are within
short walks. For a family with children,
my home would be a great walkable solution.)
On the other
hand, one could argue that the desire for affordable housing could actually go
higher if the financial savings that should accrue to walkable settings weren’t
being redirected by government policies that favor sprawl.
Regardless
of the arguments that can be made about the exact numbers, with a spread of 68
percent versus 4 percent, it’s obvious that there’s huge disconnect between the
housing that most people want and the housing that they’re being offered. That disconnect was much of the focus of CNU
23.
Respect
for Jane Jacobs: I’ve previously
written about how much respect the urbanist community has for Jane Jacobs. She’s not the font of all urbanist thinking,
but her seminal work “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” was a key
step in getting urban thinking back on track after a series of unfortunate
missteps.
An example
of this respect was given by a Dallas civic leader who held introduce the speaker
at the first plenary session for CNU 23.
Years
earlier, the civic leader had organized an annual series of program on revitalizing
downtown Dallas. Securing high-quality
speakers was one of her tasks. One year,
she put a full-court press on Jane Jacobs, flying several times to Toronto to
implore Jacobs to attend.
When Jacobs
finally agreed, the organizer turned her attention to Christopher Alexander,
author of “A Pattern Language” which is considered a key document in the understanding
the design details of good urbanism. At
first, Alexander demurred, claiming other commitments and work obligations.
The
organizer then told Alexander that Jane Jacobs has agreed to participate. After a long pause, Alexander replied “I’d
walk to Dallas to meet Jane Jacobs.” It must have been a fine program.
Poorly
Assembled Mixed-Use: A key element of urbanism is mixed-use, by which
urbanists mean walkable mixed-use, with the disparate elements of life located
in adequate proximity that cars aren’t needed for many daily tasks. One of the acknowledged founders of the New
Urbanism, Andres Duany, noted how important the walkable term is by noting that
“Sprawl is also mixed-use, poorly assembled mixed-use.”
Before
closing, I should make a note about the Dallas transit system. The system isn’t quite as cohesive as it
might be, with some unfortunately long walks to transit stops, but it does
provide effective service for many trips.
Using a bus ride and the Orange Line rail system, I was able to travel
to and from my arrival airport for only $2.50 each way. And the downtown walk to my hotel was only
three short blocks. I’ve love similar
convenience and pricing in other cities.
However, for
those of a certain age, the route back to the airport could be unsettling. The Orange Line train passes right behind the
former Texas School Book Depository, with its sixth floor museum, and then
stops at the Parkland Medical Center. If those
locations don’t touch a nerve, ask your parents. Or your grandparents.
In my next
post, I’ll continue with stories from CNU 23.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment