There always
seems to something further that can be written on past topics. Today will be a day to add supplement details
to past discussions on transit funding, Petaluma Urban Chat, City Repair, and
curvy bike paths.
Petaluma
Transit Advisory Committee: As previously described, the Petaluma Transit
Advisory Committee, on which I serve, met yesterday to consider an agenda with items
of broader scope than our usual agenda items.
After
hearing from the Friends of SMART and the Greenbelt Alliance, the committee voted
to ask the Petaluma City Council to consider devoting a portion of the funds
from the upcoming Measure A, if it passes, to transit. Except for the one committee member who
missed the meeting, the vote was unanimous.
The
suggested transit funding was ten percent of the increased sales tax proceeds,
an amount that is roughly consistent with pledges previously made by the Sonoma
County Supervisors and by the Cities of Santa Rosa and Sonoma.
The use to
which Petaluma Transit would put the funds was left undecided, but several
possibilities for enhanced service were noted.
The agenda
also included an update from a SMART representative about the interfaces
between Petaluma Transit and SMART, including bus stop location, train schedule,
and development plans for the mixed-use complex planned for the parcel
adjoining the station. No resolutions were
reached, but lines of communication were opened, which was appropriate with SMART’s
beginning of fare service barely 18 months away.
Petaluma
Urban Chat: A recent post on food truck parks elicited a number of
interested responses, including from folks who are planning on putting their
own trucks on the street and folks who have been considering developing food truck
parks. Accordingly, I’ve scheduled a
food truck discussion for the upcoming Petaluma Urban Chat meeting, Tuesday,
May 12, 5:30pm, at the Aqus Café at 2nd and H Streets.
Admittedly, most
of the folks who contacted me about the food truck post haven’t yet confirmed
their attendance for the meeting, so we may mostly end up talking with each
other, but there are worse things that talking urbanist philosophy over a cold
beer.
Also, the
meeting will be somewhat curtailed. Aqus
has scheduled a Sustainability Mixer for 6:30pm the same evening. I’m planning on staying around for the mixer,
although I’m often a bit cranky at sustainability meetings. It bothers me that many of the sustainability
causes championed at meetings like this tend to be dealing with the impacts of
drivable sprawl and yet few folks, except for the Urban Chat attendees, talk
about the alternative to drivable sprawl.
But I usually hide my crankiness well.
City
Repair: Next, I recently wrote that the flurry of City Repair ideas
from fall 2013 had mostly disappeared without a trace, the only
possible exception being neighborhood libraries.
However, one
of those lost projects has continued moving ahead quietly and with little
notice. In the next week, an on-line
survey should be distributed to neighbors about the traffic on Fair Street in
front of Petaluma High School. The
results may be used to formulate a City Repair intervention on the street,
which is particularly wide and prone to car/pedestrian conflicts.
When
available, I’ll provide a link to the survey.
Curves
versus Gentle Bends: Last, I recently vented about curvy bicycle/pedestrian paths, arguing that
tight curves impeded efficient travel for no valid reason. A bicycling architect who I know well
promptly responded that long straight stretches are boring for bicyclists.
Perhaps I
could have been more precise in my description of the types of path to which I
was taking offense, although I would have expected that my endorsement of “a
gently bending street that provides constantly changing vistas to draw
pedestrians onward” would have made it clear that I wasn’t arguing for long
straight streets.
But just to
make the point completely clear, I love long radius curves that provide a
continuously changing backdrop for travel by foot or on bike. Regent Street in London is my go-to example,
but I’m unable to find a photo in my files.
Noble Street in the Uptown District of Dallas will serve instead. I think Noble Street is how city streets
should be designed and encourage urban designers to follow that approach where
possible.
Conversely, I
detest tight little curves that slow travel and serve no point except feeding
the ego of the designer. The new bike
path at the Petaluma soccer fields on E. Washington Street is a fine example.
I hope this makes
my thinking perfectly clear.
Even worse, the
architect prefaced his comments with “Spoken like a true engineer.” Nothing like relying on imprecise stereotypes to make a point. Harrumph.
In my next
post, I’ll begin my summary of the best moments from CNU 23, the recent annual
meeting of the Congress from the New Urbanism.
As always,
your questions or comments will be appreciated.
Please comment below or email me.
And thanks for reading. - Dave Alden (davealden53@comcast.net)
No comments:
Post a Comment